Texas Codes

Tex. Alco. Bev. Code § 32.01 (2026)

Authorized Activities

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 32.01. AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES. (a) A private club registration permit authorizes alcoholic beverages belonging to members of the club to be:

(1) stored, possessed, and mixed on the club premises;

(2) served for on-premises consumption only to members of the club and their families and guests, by the drink or in sealed, unsealed, or broken containers of any legal size; and

(3) served for off-premises consumption only to members of the club in the manner provided by Section 32.155.

(b) An applicant for or the holder of a private club registration permit may apply to the commission to have the activities authorized under the permit restricted to the storage and service of wine and malt beverages for members of the club. Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, an applicant for or the holder of a permit that is restricted under this subsection is subject to all the requirements of this chapter. The commission may adopt rules as necessary to implement this subsection.

Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 435, ch. 194, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1977. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 290, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.

Amended by:

Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1359 (H.B. 1545), Sec. 125, eff. September 1, 2021.

Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., Ch. 6 (H.B. 1024), Sec. 3, eff. May 12, 2021.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2011–2011 · leading case: Plano Miller Club, Inc. v. Alan Steen, No. 03-08-00661-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 14, 2011).
Plano Miller Club, Inc. v. Alan Steen, No. 03-08-00661-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 14, 2011). “See Tex. Alco. Bev. Code Ann. § 32.01 (West 2007).”
Plano Miller Club, Inc. v. Alan Steen, No. 03-08-00661-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 14, 2011). “Over four years later, the Clubs sought a declaration that section 32.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.