Tex. Codes » Alcoholic Beverage Code · TITLE 3. LICENSES AND PERMITS · SUBTITLE B. LICENSES · CHAPTER 61. PROVISIONS GENERALLY APPLICABLE TO LICENSES
Texas Codes

Tex. Alco. Bev. Code § 61.34 (2026)

Appeal From Denial

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 61.34. APPEAL FROM DENIAL.

(a) Repealed by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1359 (H.B. 1545), Sec. 411(a)(12), eff. December 31, 2020.

(b) Repealed by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1359 (H.B. 1545), Sec. 411(a)(12), eff. December 31, 2020.

(c) If a license is issued on the basis of a district court judgment and that judgment is reversed on appeal, the mandate of the appellate court automatically invalidates the license and the applicant is entitled to a proportionate refund of fees for the unexpired portion of the license. As much of the proceeds from license fees collected under this subtitle as is necessary may be appropriated for the payment of those refunds.

(d) A person appealing from an order denying a license shall give bond for all costs incident to the appeal and shall be required to pay those costs if the judgment on appeal is unfavorable to the applicant, but not otherwise. A bond is not required on appeals filed on behalf of the state.

Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 463, ch. 194, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1977.

Amended by:

Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 763 (S.B. 1035), Sec. 6, eff. September 1, 2013.

Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1359 (H.B. 1545), Sec. 173, eff. December 31, 2020.

Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1359 (H.B. 1545), Sec. 411(a)(12), eff. December 31, 2020.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–2009 · leading case: Edwards Aquifer Auth. v. Chem. Lime, Ltd., 291 S.W.3d 392 (Tex. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Edwards Aquifer Auth. v. Chem. Lime, Ltd., 291 S.W.3d 392 (Tex. 2009). · cites it 4× “[6] See TEX. ALCO. BEV.CODE § 61.34(c) (providing that if alcoholic beverage license issued by order of district court is reversed on appeal, "the mandate of the appellate court automatically invalidates the license").”
Lindsay v. Sterling, 690 S.W.2d 560 (Tex. 1985). “Under Tex.Alco.Bev.Code Ann. §§ 61.31-.32 (Vernon 1978), a county judge is authorized to hold a hearing on the application and enter an order stating whether the application should be granted.”
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Comm'n v. Sierra, 784 S.W.2d 359 (Tex. 1990). “See Tex.Alco.Bev.Code Ann. §§ 61.34, 11.67(b) (Vernon 1978).”
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Comm'n v. Jesus Rodriguez D/B/A La Gaviota Nite Club (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “6252-13a, § 19(a)); Tex. Alco. Bev. Code Ann. § 61.34 (a), 11.”
Christa Denise Nash D/B/A Club Foxy v. Orange Cnty., Texas (Tex. App. 2003). “See Tex. Alco. Bev. Code Ann. § 61.34 (Vernon 1994).”
— Tex. Alco. Bev. Code § 61.34(c) — 1 case
Edwards Aquifer Auth. v. Chem. Lime, Ltd., 291 S.W.3d 392 (Tex. 2009). “[6] See TEX. ALCO. BEV.CODE § 61.34(c) (providing that if alcoholic beverage license issued by order of district court is reversed on appeal, "the mandate of the appellate court automatically invalidates the license").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.