Texas Codes

Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 10.001 (2026)

Adoption Of Plan Of Merger

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 10.001. ADOPTION OF PLAN OF MERGER. (a) A domestic entity may effect a merger by complying with the applicable provisions of this code. A merger must be set forth in a plan of merger.

(b) To effect a merger, each domestic entity that is a party to the merger must act on and approve the plan of merger in the manner prescribed by this code for the approval of mergers by the domestic entity.

(c) A domestic entity subject to dissenters' rights must provide the notice required by Section 10.355.

(d) If one or more non-code organizations is a party to the merger or is to be created by the plan of merger:

(1) to effect the merger each non-code organization must take all action required by this code and its governing documents;

(2) the merger must be permitted by:

(A) the law of the state or country under whose law each non-code organization is incorporated or organized; or

(B) the governing documents of each non-code organization if the documents are not inconsistent with the law under which the non-code organization is incorporated or organized; and

(3) in effecting the merger each non-code organization that is a party to the merger must comply with:

(A) the applicable laws under which it is incorporated or organized; and

(B) the governing documents of the non-code organization.

(e) A domestic entity may not merge under this subchapter if an owner or member of that entity that is a party to the merger will, as a result of the merger, become subject to owner liability, without that owner's or member's consent, for a liability or other obligation of any other person.

Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 182, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2006.

Amended by:

Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 32 (S.B. 860), Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2015.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2019–2023 · leading case: William R. Kruse & Deborah Kruse v. Henderson Texas Bancshares, Inc. (Tex. App. 2019).
William R. Kruse & Deborah Kruse v. Henderson Texas Bancshares, Inc. (Tex. App. 2019). “Laws 274 -82 (codified at TEX. BUS. ORG. CODE ANN. §§ 10.001- .902).”
Plastronics Socket Partners v. Hwang (Fed. Cir. 2022). “” Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code Ann. § 10.001 (West 2015).”
William Scott Taylor WPEM, LLC & W2W, LLC v. Hunton Andrews Kurth, LLP, F/K/A Andrews & Kurth, LLP Douglas Rommelmann & Brett Cooke (Tex. App. 2023). “See Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code Ann. § 10.001 (b) (“To effect a merger, each domestic entity that is a party to the merger must act on and approve the plan of merger in the manner prescribed by this code for the approval of mergers by the domestic entity.”
Kelly v. Corizon Health Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2022). “Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code §§ 10.001(a), 10.003.”
Jackson v. Corizon Health Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2022). “Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code §§ 10.001(a), 10.003.”
1400 FM 1417 LLC v. CertainTeed Corp. (E.D. Tex. 2022). “See TEX. BUS. ORGS. CODE § 10.001, et seq. “When a merger takes effect, the separate existence of each domestic entity that is a party to the merger, other than a surviving or new domestic entity, ceases.”
LTL Mgmt. LLC (Bankr. D.N.J. 2023). “On October 12, 2021, Old JJCI engaged in a series of transactions pursuant to the Texas divisional merger statute, See TEX. BUS. ORGS. CODE ANN. §§ 10.001 et seq.”
LTL Mgmt. LLC v. Those Parties Listed on Appendix A to the Complain (Bankr. D.N.J. 2023). “On October 12, 2021, Old JJCI engaged in a series of transactions pursuant to the Texas divisional merger statute, See Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code Ann. §§ 10.001 et seq.”
Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 10.001(a): 2 cases
Kelly v. Corizon Health Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2022). “Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code §§ 10.001(a), 10.003.”
Jackson v. Corizon Health Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2022). “Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code §§ 10.001(a), 10.003.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.