Tex. Codes » Business Organizations Code · TITLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS · CHAPTER 11. WINDING UP AND TERMINATION OF DOMESTIC ENTITY
Texas Codes

Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 11.402 (2026)

Jurisdiction To Appoint Receiver

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 11.402. JURISDICTION TO APPOINT RECEIVER. (a) A court that has subject matter jurisdiction over specific property of a domestic or foreign entity that is located in this state and is involved in litigation has jurisdiction to appoint a receiver for that property as provided by Section 11.403.

(b) A district court in the county in which the registered office or principal place of business of a domestic entity is located has jurisdiction to:

(1) appoint a receiver for the property and business of a domestic entity for the purpose of rehabilitating the entity as provided by Section 11.404; or

(2) order the liquidation of the property and business of a domestic entity and appoint a receiver to effect that liquidation as provided by Section 11.405.

Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 182, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2006.

Amended by:

Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 139 (S.B. 748), Sec. 19, eff. September 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2011–2025 · leading case: Ritchie v. Rupe, 339 S.W.3d 275 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ritchie v. Rupe, 339 S.W.3d 275 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011). “Laws 267 , 595 (now codified at Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code Ann. §§ 11.402 , 404 (West 2010)).”
Argo Data Resource Corp. v. Shagrithaya, 380 S.W.3d 249 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012). “See Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code Ann. § 11.402 (West 2012).”
Camil Kreit v. Christopher Quinn, 690 F. App'x 283 (5th Cir. 2017). “See Tex Bus. Orgs. Code § 11.402 (“A court that has subject matter jurisdiction over specific property of a domestic or foreign entity that is located in this state and is involved in litigation has jurisdiction to appoint a receiver for that property.”
Dream Creek Enter., Inc. v. BBL Builders, L.P., No. 05-15-00768-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 3, 2015). · cites it 2× “passim Tex. Bus. Org. Code § 11.403 ............”
In re Est. of Michael Allen Hallmark, 629 S.W.3d 433 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2020). “TEX. BUS. ORGS. CODE ANN. § 11.402 (West 2020).”
Wenxin "Cindy" Xia v. Raymond Floyd, No. 02-20-00351-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 2, 2021). “See Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code Ann. § 11.402 (b). She also characterized Section 11.”
Eclipse Gaming Sys., LLC v. Antonucci, No. 1:17-cv-00196, 2018 WL 2463379 (N.D. Ill. June 1, 2018). “51) at ¶ 3; Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 11.402(b) (stating that the district court “in the county in which the registered office or principle place of business of a domestic entity is located has jurisdiction to” appoint a receiver under § 11.”
In re T. Bently Durant; Thomas R. Durant; The Durant Classic Dynasty Trust; Michael A. Ward; 8100 Partners, Ltd.; 8100 Mgmt. LLC; 8705 Partners, Ltd.; 8705 Mgmt. LLC; Classic Chevrolet Sugar Land LLC; Classic Chevrolet West Houston, LLC; Classic Elite Buick GMC, Inc.; & 16835 Cadet Partners, LLC v. the State of Texas, No. 15-25-00019-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Mar. 21, 2025). “071 (mandatory venue for action for appointment of corporate receiver is county where the corporation’s principal office is located); TEX. BUS. ORGS. CODE § 11.402 (district courts in county where a domestic entity’s registered office or principal place of business is located…”
Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 11.402(b): 2 cases
Eclipse Gaming Sys., LLC v. Antonucci, No. 1:17-cv-00196, 2018 WL 2463379 (N.D. Ill. June 1, 2018). “51) at ¶ 3; Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 11.402(b) (stating that the district court “in the county in which the registered office or principle place of business of a domestic entity is located has jurisdiction to” appoint a receiver under § 11.”
Dream Creek Enter., Inc. v. BBL Builders, L.P., No. 05-15-00768-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 3, 2015). “passim Tex. Bus. Org. Code § 11.403 ............”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.