Texas Codes

Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 2.105 (2026)

Additional Powers Of Certain Pipeline Businesses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 2.105. ADDITIONAL POWERS OF CERTAIN PIPELINE BUSINESSES. In addition to the powers provided by the other sections of this subchapter, a corporation, general partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, or other combination of those entities engaged as a common carrier in the pipeline business for the purpose of transporting oil, oil products, gas, carbon dioxide, salt brine, fuller's earth, sand, clay, liquefied minerals, or other mineral solutions has all the rights and powers conferred on a common carrier by Sections 111.019-111.022, Natural Resources Code.

Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 182, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2006.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2011–2025 · leading case: Occidental Chem. Corp. v. ETC NGL Transp., LLC, 425 S.W.3d 354 (Tex. App. 2011).
Occidental Chem. Corp. v. ETC NGL Transp., LLC, 425 S.W.3d 354 (Tex. App. 2011). “019; see also Tex. Bus. Org. Code Ann. § 2.105 (Vernon Supp.”
Crosstex NGL Pipeline, L.P. v. Reins Road Farms-1, Ltd., 404 S.W.3d 754 (Tex. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “5 See Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code Ann. § 2.105 (West 2012).”
Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, Llc v. Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd., 510 S.W.3d 909 (Tex. 2017). “See Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 2.105. Because we hold that Denbury Green is a common carrier under Chapter 111 of the Natural Resources Code, we need not decide this question.”
Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd., James E. Holland, David C. Holland, & Mike Latta v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLC, 457 S.W.3d 115 (Tex. App. 2015). “Tex. Bus. Org. Code Ann. § 2.105 (West 2012).”
Terrance J. Hlavinka, Kenneth Hlavinka, Tres Bayou Farms, Lp, & Terrance Hlavinka Cattle Co. v. Hsc Pipeline P'ship, Llc (Tex. 2022). · cites it 4× “6Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 2.105; Tex. Nat. Res.”
Right-Way Sand Co. A/K/A Right Way Sand, Inc., RPRS Investments, Ltd. & Adloy, LLC v. South Texas Pipelines LLC & HSC Pipeline P'ship LLC (Tex. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “, and Adloy, LLC (collectively, “appellants” or “landowners”), to exercise a statutory power of eminent domain in connection with the construction of a new pipeline.”
T.B. Farms, Ltd. v. Grand Prix Pipeline, LLC (Tex. App. 2025). “Under the Business Organizations Code, an entity “engaged as a common carrier in the pipeline business for the purpose of transporting oil, oil products, gas, .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.