Sec. 141.063. VALIDITY OF SIGNATURE. (a) A signature on a petition is valid if:
(1) except as otherwise provided by this code, the signer, at the time of signing, is a registered voter of the territory from which the office sought is elected or has been issued a registration certificate for a registration that will become effective in that territory on or before the date of the applicable election;
(2) the petition includes the following information with respect to each signer:
(A) the signer's residence address;
(B) the signer's date of birth or the signer's voter registration number and, if the territory from which signatures must be obtained is situated in more than one county, the county of registration;
(C) the date of signing; and
(D) the signer's printed name;
(3) the part of the petition in which the signature appears contains the affidavit required by Section 141.065;
(4) each statement that is required by this code to appear on each page of the petition appears, at the time of signing, on the page on which the signature is entered; and
(5) any other applicable requirements prescribed by this code for a signature's validity are complied with.
(b) The signature is the only information that is required to appear on the petition in the signer's own handwriting.
(c) The use of ditto marks or abbreviations does not invalidate a signature if the required information is reasonably ascertainable.
(d) The omission of the state from the signer's residence address does not invalidate a signature unless the political subdivision from which the signature is obtained is situated in more than one state. The omission of the zip code from the address does not invalidate a signature.
(e) The signer's residence address and registration address are not required to be the same if the signer would otherwise be able to vote for that office under Section 11.004 or 112.002.
Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 211, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1986. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1349, Sec. 52, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 726 (H.B. 1509), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.
Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., Ch. 711 (H.B. 3107), Sec. 80, eff. September 1, 2021.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
21
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1988–2022 · leading case:
In Re Bell, 91 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. 2002).
In Re Bell, 91 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. 2002).
· cites it 34× “By letter dated January 4, 2002, respondents rejected Bell's application due to "insufficient signature requirements," citing Texas Election Code section 141.063. *785 Respondents provided no further explanation for rejecting Bell's application.”
In Re Angelini, 186 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2006).
· cites it 2× “[8] See TEX. ELEC. CODE § 141.063(a)(3)-(4). [9] In re Gamble, 71 S.”
Brady v. Fourteenth Court of Appeals, 795 S.W.2d 712 (Tex. 1990).
“Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 141.063 (Vernon 1986): A signature on a petition is valid if: (1) except as otherwise provided by this code, the signer, at the time of signing, is a registered voter of the territory from which the office sought is elected or has been issued a registration…”
Bejarano v. Hunter, 899 S.W.2d 346 (Tex. App. 1995).
· cites it 2× “3 Compare Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 141.063(2) (Vernon 1986) with El Paso City Chaeter § 2.”
Correa v. First Court of Appeals, 795 S.W.2d 704 (Tex. 1990).
· cites it 2× “Accompanying his application was the necessary filing fee and petitions containing 333 signatures. See Tex.Elec.Code § 172.”
In re Perez, 508 S.W.3d 500 (Tex. App. 2016).
“” Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 141.063 (a)(1). It concluded that since the candidate was running for Justice of the Peace in Precinct 4 of Harris County, each person signing the candidate’s petition had to be, at the time of signing, a registered voter residing in that precinct.”
Cohen v. Strake, 743 S.W.2d 366 (Tex. App. 1988).
· cites it 2× “Relator's first argument is based on TEX. ELEC.CODE §§ 141.063(2)(A), 1.005(17).”
Bacon v. Harris Cnty. Repub. Exec. Comm., 743 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. App. 1988).
“As applied to this case Texas Election Code § 141.063 provides that a signature on a petition is valid if (1) the signer, at the time of signing, is a registered voter of Harris County and (2) the petition includes the signer’s residence address, voter registration number, the…”
Pilcher v. Rains, 683 F. Supp. 1130 (W.D. Tex. 1988).
“Texas Election Code § 141.062(a)(3) (Vernon 1986) provides as follows: (a) To be valid, a petition must: ***** * (3) comply with any other applicable requirements for validity prescribed by this code.”
Strayhorn v. Williams, 430 F. Supp. 2d 661 (W.D. Tex. 2006).
“See Tex. Elec.Code Ann. § 141.063(a) (West Supp.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(2) — 1 case
Bejarano v. Hunter, 899 S.W.2d 346 (Tex. App. 1995).
“3 Compare Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 141.063(2) (Vernon 1986) with El Paso City Chaeter § 2.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(2)(A) — 2 cases
Cohen v. Strake, 743 S.W.2d 366 (Tex. App. 1988).
“Relator's first argument is based on TEX. ELEC.CODE §§ 141.063(2)(A), 1.005(17).”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(2)(B) — 2 cases
Pilcher v. Rains, 683 F. Supp. 1130 (W.D. Tex. 1988).
“Texas Election Code § 141.062(a)(3) (Vernon 1986) provides as follows: (a) To be valid, a petition must: ***** * (3) comply with any other applicable requirements for validity prescribed by this code.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(2)(C) — 1 case
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(3) — 1 case
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(4) — 1 case
Bejarano v. Hunter, 899 S.W.2d 346 (Tex. App. 1995).
“3 Compare Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 141.063(2) (Vernon 1986) with El Paso City Chaeter § 2.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(a) — 2 cases
In Re Bell, 91 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. 2002).
“By letter dated January 4, 2002, respondents rejected Bell's application due to "insufficient signature requirements," citing Texas Election Code section 141.063. *785 Respondents provided no further explanation for rejecting Bell's application.”
Strayhorn v. Williams, 430 F. Supp. 2d 661 (W.D. Tex. 2006).
“See Tex. Elec.Code Ann. § 141.063(a) (West Supp.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(a)(1) — 1 case
In Re Bell, 91 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. 2002).
“By letter dated January 4, 2002, respondents rejected Bell's application due to "insufficient signature requirements," citing Texas Election Code section 141.063. *785 Respondents provided no further explanation for rejecting Bell's application.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(a)(2) — 1 case
In Re Bell, 91 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. 2002).
“By letter dated January 4, 2002, respondents rejected Bell's application due to "insufficient signature requirements," citing Texas Election Code section 141.063. *785 Respondents provided no further explanation for rejecting Bell's application.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(a)(2)(A) — 1 case
In Re Bell, 91 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. 2002).
“By letter dated January 4, 2002, respondents rejected Bell's application due to "insufficient signature requirements," citing Texas Election Code section 141.063. *785 Respondents provided no further explanation for rejecting Bell's application.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(a)(3) — 1 case
In Re Angelini, 186 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2006).
“[8] See TEX. ELEC. CODE § 141.063(a)(3)-(4). [9] In re Gamble, 71 S.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(b) — 3 cases
In Re Bell, 91 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. 2002).
“By letter dated January 4, 2002, respondents rejected Bell's application due to "insufficient signature requirements," citing Texas Election Code section 141.063. *785 Respondents provided no further explanation for rejecting Bell's application.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(c) — 1 case
— Tex. Elec. Code § 141.063(d) — 2 cases
In Re Bell, 91 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. 2002).
“By letter dated January 4, 2002, respondents rejected Bell's application due to "insufficient signature requirements," citing Texas Election Code section 141.063. *785 Respondents provided no further explanation for rejecting Bell's application.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.