Texas Codes

Tex. Elec. Code § 233.007 (2026)

Filing Period For Answer

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 233.007. FILING PERIOD FOR ANSWER. (a) A contestee must file an answer to the contestant's petition not later than:

(1) 10 a.m. of the 10th day after the date of service of citation on the contestee or 10 a.m. of the fifth day after the date the official result of the contested election is determined, whichever is later, if the contested election is less than statewide; or

(2) 10 a.m. of the 20th day after the date of service of citation, if the contested election is statewide.

(b) The citation must command the contestee to answer by the specified deadline.

Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 211, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1986.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Jane Nelson v. Jarrett Woodward, No. 15-24-00074-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Jan. 28, 2025).
Jane Nelson v. Jarrett Woodward, No. 15-24-00074-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Jan. 28, 2025). · cites it 4× “The Citation Requirements of Texas Election Code §§ 233.007, 233.008 Are Not Jurisdictional.”
Jane Nelson v. Jarrett Woodward, No. 15-24-00038-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Apr. 3, 2025). · cites it 2× “” Tex. Elec. Code § 233.007(a)(2). 4 was a mandatory requirement of Section 233.”
Tex. Elec. Code § 233.007(a)(2): 2 cases
Jane Nelson v. Jarrett Woodward, No. 15-24-00038-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Apr. 3, 2025). “” Tex. Elec. Code § 233.007(a)(2). 4 was a mandatory requirement of Section 233.”
Jane Nelson v. Jarrett Woodward, No. 15-24-00074-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Jan. 28, 2025). “The Citation Requirements of Texas Election Code §§ 233.007, 233.008 Are Not Jurisdictional.”
Tex. Elec. Code § 233.007(b): 1 case
Jane Nelson v. Jarrett Woodward, No. 15-24-00074-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Jan. 28, 2025). “The Citation Requirements of Texas Election Code §§ 233.007, 233.008 Are Not Jurisdictional.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.