Tex. Codes » Election Code · TITLE 7. EARLY VOTING · SUBTITLE A. EARLY VOTING · CHAPTER 84. APPLICATION FOR BALLOT
Texas Codes

Tex. Elec. Code § 84.035 (2026)

Ballot Sent To Applicant

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 84.035. BALLOT SENT TO APPLICANT. (a) If the early voting clerk cancels an application by an applicant to whom an early voting ballot has been sent, the clerk shall:

(1) remove the applicant's name from the early voting roster; and

(2) make any other entries in the records and take any other action necessary to prevent the ballot from being counted if returned.

(b) An election judge may permit a person to whom an early voting ballot has been sent who cancels the person's application for a ballot to be voted by mail in accordance with Section 84.032 but fails to return the ballot to be voted by mail to the early voting clerk, deputy early voting clerk, or presiding judge as provided by that section to vote only a provisional ballot under Section 63.011.

Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 211, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1986. Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 203, Sec. 2.08; Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 554, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1991.

Amended by:

Acts 2021, 87th Leg., 2nd C.S., Ch. 1 (S.B. 1), Sec. 5.06, eff. December 2, 2021.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Un del Pueblo Entero v. Nelson, 163 F.4th 239 (5th Cir. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Un del Pueblo Entero v. Nelson, 163 F.4th 239 (5th Cir. 2025). · cites it 4× “06 (codified at Tex. Elec. Code § 84.035). None of these duties are held by the Secretary, so the purportedly unconstitutional burdens on plaintiffs’ members are coming from different state officials.”
Tex. Elec. Code § 84.035(b): 1 case
Un del Pueblo Entero v. Nelson, 163 F.4th 239 (5th Cir. 2025). “06 (codified at Tex. Elec. Code § 84.035). None of these duties are held by the Secretary, so the purportedly unconstitutional burdens on plaintiffs’ members are coming from different state officials.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.