Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 105.006 (2026)

Contents Of Final Order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 105.006. CONTENTS OF FINAL ORDER. (a) A final order, other than in a proceeding under Chapter 161 or 162, must contain:

(1) the social security number and driver's license number of each party to the suit, including the child, except that the child's social security number or driver's license number is not required if the child has not been assigned a social security number or driver's license number; and

(2) each party's current residence address, mailing address, e-mail address, home telephone number, name of employer, address of employment, and work telephone number, except as provided by Subsection (c).

(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c), the court shall order each party to inform each other party, the court that rendered the order, and the state case registry under Chapter 234 of an intended change in any of the information required by this section as long as any person, as a result of the order, is under an obligation to pay child support or is entitled to possession of or access to a child. The court shall order that notice of the intended change be given at the earlier of:

(1) the 60th day before the date the party intends to make the change; or

(2) the fifth day after the date that the party knew of the change, if the party did not know or could not have known of the change in sufficient time to comply with Subdivision (1).

(c) If a court finds after notice and hearing that requiring a party to provide the information required by this section to another party is likely to cause the child or a conservator harassment, abuse, serious harm, or injury, or to subject the child or a conservator to family violence, as defined by Section 71.004, the court may:

(1) order the information not to be disclosed to another party; or

(2) render any other order the court considers necessary.

(c-1) Except as provided by Subsection (c-2), if a court renders an order under Subsection (c) prohibiting the disclosure of a party's information, the court shall require that the party provide to the court, for inclusion in the final order, an e-mail address at which the party may receive:

(1) notice and service of process of subsequent motions, petitions, or other legal pleadings using the electronic filing system established under Section 72.031, Government Code; and

(2) other legal documents or required notices.

(c-2) If the court finds that requiring a party to provide an e-mail address under Subsection (c-1) is likely to endanger the safety of the party, the court may not require the party to provide the e-mail address under that subsection.

(d) An order in a suit that orders child support or possession of or access to a child must contain the following prominently displayed statement in boldfaced type, capital letters, or underlined:

"FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER FOR CHILD SUPPORT OR FOR POSSESSION OF OR ACCESS TO A CHILD MAY RESULT IN FURTHER LITIGATION TO ENFORCE THE ORDER, INCLUDING CONTEMPT OF COURT. A FINDING OF CONTEMPT MAY BE PUNISHED BY CONFINEMENT IN JAIL FOR UP TO SIX MONTHS, A FINE OF UP TO $500 FOR EACH VIOLATION, AND A MONEY JUDGMENT FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COURT COSTS."

"FAILURE OF A PARTY TO MAKE A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE PLACE AND IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY A COURT ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE PARTY NOT RECEIVING CREDIT FOR MAKING THE PAYMENT."

"FAILURE OF A PARTY TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT DOES NOT JUSTIFY DENYING THAT PARTY COURT-ORDERED POSSESSION OF OR ACCESS TO A CHILD. REFUSAL BY A PARTY TO ALLOW POSSESSION OF OR ACCESS TO A CHILD DOES NOT JUSTIFY FAILURE TO PAY COURT-ORDERED CHILD SUPPORT TO THAT PARTY."

(e) Except as provided by Subsection (c), an order in a suit that orders child support or possession of or access to a child must also contain the following prominently displayed statement in boldfaced type, capital letters, or underlined:

"EACH PERSON WHO IS A PARTY TO THIS ORDER IS ORDERED TO NOTIFY EACH OTHER PARTY, THE COURT, AND THE STATE CASE REGISTRY OF ANY CHANGE IN THE PARTY'S CURRENT RESIDENCE ADDRESS, MAILING ADDRESS, E-MAIL ADDRESS, HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER, NAME OF EMPLOYER, ADDRESS OF EMPLOYMENT, DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER, AND WORK TELEPHONE NUMBER. THE PARTY IS ORDERED TO GIVE NOTICE OF AN INTENDED CHANGE IN ANY OF THE REQUIRED INFORMATION TO EACH OTHER PARTY, THE COURT, AND THE STATE CASE REGISTRY ON OR BEFORE THE 60TH DAY BEFORE THE INTENDED CHANGE. IF THE PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR COULD NOT HAVE KNOWN OF THE CHANGE IN SUFFICIENT TIME TO PROVIDE 60-DAY NOTICE, THE PARTY IS ORDERED TO GIVE NOTICE OF THE CHANGE ON OR BEFORE THE FIFTH DAY AFTER THE DATE THAT THE PARTY KNOWS OF THE CHANGE."

"THE DUTY TO FURNISH THIS INFORMATION TO EACH OTHER PARTY, THE COURT, AND THE STATE CASE REGISTRY CONTINUES AS LONG AS ANY PERSON, BY VIRTUE OF THIS ORDER, IS UNDER AN OBLIGATION TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT OR ENTITLED TO POSSESSION OF OR ACCESS TO A CHILD."

"FAILURE BY A PARTY TO OBEY THE ORDER OF THIS COURT TO PROVIDE EACH OTHER PARTY, THE COURT, AND THE STATE CASE REGISTRY WITH THE CHANGE IN THE REQUIRED INFORMATION MAY RESULT IN FURTHER LITIGATION TO ENFORCE THE ORDER, INCLUDING CONTEMPT OF COURT. A FINDING OF CONTEMPT MAY BE PUNISHED BY CONFINEMENT IN JAIL FOR UP TO SIX MONTHS, A FINE OF UP TO $500 FOR EACH VIOLATION, AND A MONEY JUDGMENT FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COURT COSTS."

(e-1) An order in a suit that provides for the possession of or access to a child must contain the following prominently displayed statement in boldfaced type, in capital letters, or underlined:

"NOTICE TO ANY PEACE OFFICER OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: YOU MAY USE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO ENFORCE THE TERMS OF CHILD CUSTODY SPECIFIED IN THIS ORDER. A PEACE OFFICER WHO RELIES ON THE TERMS OF A COURT ORDER AND THE OFFICER'S AGENCY ARE ENTITLED TO THE APPLICABLE IMMUNITY AGAINST ANY CLAIM, CIVIL OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING THE OFFICER'S GOOD FAITH ACTS PERFORMED IN THE SCOPE OF THE OFFICER'S DUTIES IN ENFORCING THE TERMS OF THE ORDER THAT RELATE TO CHILD CUSTODY. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY PRESENTS FOR ENFORCEMENT AN ORDER THAT IS INVALID OR NO LONGER IN EFFECT COMMITS AN OFFENSE THAT MAY BE PUNISHABLE BY CONFINEMENT IN JAIL FOR AS LONG AS TWO YEARS AND A FINE OF AS MUCH AS $10,000."

(e-2) An order in a suit that orders child support must contain the following prominently displayed statement in boldfaced type, in capital letters, or underlined:

"THE COURT MAY MODIFY THIS ORDER THAT PROVIDES FOR THE SUPPORT OF A CHILD, IF:

(1) THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CHILD OR A PERSON AFFECTED BY THE ORDER HAVE MATERIALLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGED; OR

(2) IT HAS BEEN THREE YEARS SINCE THE ORDER WAS RENDERED OR LAST MODIFIED AND THE MONTHLY AMOUNT OF THE CHILD SUPPORT AWARD UNDER THE ORDER DIFFERS BY EITHER 20 PERCENT OR $100 FROM THE AMOUNT THAT WOULD BE AWARDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES."

(f) Except for an action in which contempt is sought, in any subsequent child support modification or enforcement action, the court may, on a showing that diligent effort has been made to determine the location of a party, consider due process requirements for notice and service of process to be met with respect to that party on delivery of written notice to the most recent residence address, e-mail address, or address of employment filed by that party with the court and the state case registry.

(g) The Title IV-D agency shall promulgate and provide forms for a party to use in reporting to the court and the state case registry under Chapter 234 the information required under this section.

(h) The court may include in a final order in a suit in which a party to the suit makes an allegation of child abuse or neglect a finding on whether the party who made the allegation knew that the allegation was false. This finding shall not constitute collateral estoppel for any criminal proceeding. The court may impose on a party found to have made a false allegation of child abuse or neglect any civil sanction permitted under law, including attorney's fees, costs of experts, and any other costs.

(i) The clerk may send orders, notices, and other documents relating to a final order to which this section applies to the e-mail address provided by a party under this section using the electronic filing system established under Section 72.031, Government Code.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 751, Sec. 13, 128, eff. Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 786, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 911, Sec. 6, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 19.01(21), eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 178, Sec. 5, eff. Aug. 30, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 133, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 184, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

Amended by:

Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 972 (S.B. 228), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2007.

Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 280 (H.B. 826), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2015.

Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 859 (S.B. 1726), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2015.

Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 151 (S.B. 869), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2023.

Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 828 (S.B. 1404), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2005–2025 · leading case: John Hogan v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas, 722 F.3d 725 (5th Cir. 2013).
John Hogan v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas, 722 F.3d 725 (5th Cir. 2013). “006(e-l) (West 2008) (mandating that, in an order providing for the possession of or access to a child, notice be prominently displayed regarding an officer’s right to use reasonable efforts to enforce the terms of child custody and that the notice state that “[a] peace officer…”
in Re the Off. of the Attorney Gen. of Texas, 456 S.W.3d 153 (Tex. 2015). “See Tex. Fam. Code § 105.006(c)(2). But studied in context — in light of the text and structure of surrounding and related provisions — there is no question that “any other order” cannot bear the broad meaning ascribed by the trial court.”
Jasek v. Texas Dep't of Fam. & Prot. Servs., 348 S.W.3d 523 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 105.006 (West 2008) (establishing requirements for contents of final order).”
In the INTEREST OF C.M v. a Child, 479 S.W.3d 352 (Tex. App. 2015). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 105.006 (West 2014).”
In Re Ferguson, 172 S.W.3d 122 (Tex. App. 2005). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 105.006(a)(2), (b) & 105.”
in the Interest of J. A., Jr., a Minor Child, 482 S.W.3d 141 (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “The court found that an affidavit was required because the modification action was filed within one year of both the child support review order and the divorce .”
in the Interest of E.D., a Child, 553 S.W.3d 101 (Tex. App. 2018). “argument, Father further expressly argued that Mother “failed to include her required information – including her address and phone number – as required by Section 105 of the Texas Family Code in the Order in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship, nor did she continue to…”
In the Interest of I.L.S., 339 S.W.3d 156 (Tex. App. 2011). “007(a)(14)(B) (West 2008) (allowing an associate judge to render and sign a final default order). The default order meets the requirements for a final order set forth in Section 105.”
in the Interest of R.R.K., a Child (Tex. 2019). · cites it 4× “See TEX. FAM. CODE § 105.006. The trial court heard the parties’ motions and signed a 51-page “Order in Suit to Modify Parent-Child Relationship.”
in the Interest of A.D.B., II, a Minor Child (Tex. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “Under the Family Code, a final order must: (1) contain the parties’ social security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and contact information; (2) order the parties to notify the trial court, other parties, and the State of any changes in such identifying information; and (3)…”
In the Interest of F.H., a Child v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “, and listed, along with other information required by Texas Family Code § 105.006, Mother’s and Father’s then-current residence addresses.”
In the Interest OF X.H.Q., a Child v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “Order Confirming Registration and in Suit for Modification of Child Support Order (UIFSA) Page II of 13 Docusign nveIope ID: BB39B21E-9D944A2A2F3-5298D6A2DDO4 INFORMATION PURSUANT TO TEXAS FAMILY CODE § 105.006 Court: 303RD DISTRICTCOURTDALLAS County, Texas Cause Number: DF-24-J…”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 105.006(a) — 5 cases
in the Interest of A.D.B., II, a Minor Child (Tex. App. 2021). “Under the Family Code, a final order must: (1) contain the parties’ social security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and contact information; (2) order the parties to notify the trial court, other parties, and the State of any changes in such identifying information; and (3)…”
Cheri Vega v. Arturo Lira (Tex. App. 2017).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 105.006(a)(1) — 1 case
in the Interest of R.R.K., a Child (Tex. 2019). “See TEX. FAM. CODE § 105.006. The trial court heard the parties’ motions and signed a 51-page “Order in Suit to Modify Parent-Child Relationship.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 105.006(a)(2) — 2 cases
In Re Ferguson, 172 S.W.3d 122 (Tex. App. 2005). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 105.006(a)(2), (b) & 105.”
in Re J. J. F., a Child (Tex. App. 2014).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 105.006(c) — 3 cases
in the Interest of J. A., Jr., a Minor Child, 482 S.W.3d 141 (Tex. App. 2015). “The court found that an affidavit was required because the modification action was filed within one year of both the child support review order and the divorce .”
In the Interest OF X.H.Q., a Child v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2025). “Order Confirming Registration and in Suit for Modification of Child Support Order (UIFSA) Page II of 13 Docusign nveIope ID: BB39B21E-9D944A2A2F3-5298D6A2DDO4 INFORMATION PURSUANT TO TEXAS FAMILY CODE § 105.006 Court: 303RD DISTRICTCOURTDALLAS County, Texas Cause Number: DF-24-J…”
Interest of S.D.A. (Tex. App. 2014).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 105.006(c)(2) — 2 cases
in Re the Off. of the Attorney Gen. of Texas, 456 S.W.3d 153 (Tex. 2015). “See Tex. Fam. Code § 105.006(c)(2). But studied in context — in light of the text and structure of surrounding and related provisions — there is no question that “any other order” cannot bear the broad meaning ascribed by the trial court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.