Texas Codes
Tex. Fam. Code § 106.001 (2026)
Costs
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 106.001. COSTS. The court may award costs in a suit or motion under this title and in a habeas corpus proceeding.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 15, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1996–2024 · leading case: Kirk Brand Coburn v. Janet Moreland, 433 S.W.3d 809 (Tex. App. 2014).
Kirk Brand Coburn v. Janet Moreland, 433 S.W.3d 809 (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Fam.Code §§ 106.001 (award of costs), .”
in the Interest of J.D., a Child, 436 S.W.3d 105 (Tex. App. 2014). “In sum, considering the relevant factors under the appropriate standards of review, we hold that the evidence presented at trial and summarized above is legally and factually sufficient to support the trial court’s finding by clear and convincing evidence that termination of the…”
in the Interest of E.R.C., a Minor Child, 496 S.W.3d 270 (Tex. App. 2016). “Although she concedes that the trial court may award attorney fees in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, see Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 106.001, 106.002 (West 2014), she argues that the award of attorney fees in this case was unreasonable.”
in the Interest of E.A.F., Child, 424 S.W.3d 742 (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Fam.Code § 106.001(2); Holley, 544 S.”
Diaz v. Diaz, 350 S.W.3d 251 (Tex. App. 2011). “708 (West 2006); Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 106.001, 106.002 (West 2008); see also Neal v.”
in the Interest of C.H.C & S.M.C., 396 S.W.3d 33 (Tex. App. 2013). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 106.001, .002 (West 2008).”
Farish v. Farish, 921 S.W.2d 538 (Tex. App. 1996). “Reasonable attorney’s fees may be awarded as costs in any suit affecting the parent-child relationship.”
In Re Clark, 977 S.W.2d 152 (Tex. App. 1998). “See Tex.Fam.Code Ann. §§ 106.001, 106.002 (Vernon 1996 & Supp.”
In Re Clark, 984 S.W.2d 644 (Tex. App. 1998). “See TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. §§ 106.001, 106.002 (Vernon 1996 & Supp.”
Carlson v. Carlson, 983 S.W.2d 304 (Tex. App. 1998). “” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 106.001 (Vernon Supp.”
Daniel Caldwell v. Jennifer Garfutt (Tex. App. 2016). “See Tex. Fam. Code §§ 106.001 (authorizing court to award costs in suit affecting parent-child relationship), .”
in the Interest of D.M.M., Child (Tex. App. 2017). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 106.001 (2). We overrule Mother’s and Father’s sole issues on appeal.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 106.001(2) — 4 cases
in the Interest of J.D., a Child, 436 S.W.3d 105 (Tex. App. 2014). “In sum, considering the relevant factors under the appropriate standards of review, we hold that the evidence presented at trial and summarized above is legally and factually sufficient to support the trial court’s finding by clear and convincing evidence that termination of the…”
in the Interest of E.A.F., Child, 424 S.W.3d 742 (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Fam.Code § 106.001(2); Holley, 544 S.”
in the Interest of M.F &.L.B., Child. (Tex. App. 2019).
in the Interest of R.E.T.R. & D.D.R., Jr., Child. (Tex. App. 2013).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.