Sec. 154.122. APPLICATION OF GUIDELINES REBUTTABLY PRESUMED IN BEST INTEREST OF CHILD. (a) The amount of a periodic child support payment established by the child support guidelines in effect in this state at the time of the hearing is presumed to be reasonable, and an order of support conforming to the guidelines is presumed to be in the best interest of the child.
(b) A court may determine that the application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate under the circumstances.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
74
cases (
17 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case:
Niskar v. Niskar, 136 S.W.3d 749 (Tex. App. 2004).
Niskar v. Niskar, 136 S.W.3d 749 (Tex. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “Amount of Child Support In his third issue on appeal, the appellant argues that the amount of child support ordered by the trial court deviates from the statutory guidelines even though the court explicitly stated that it was ordering support according to the guidelines. 1.…”
Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998).
· cites it 4× “See TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.125(b) (Vernon 1996).”
In the Interest of D.S., 76 S.W.3d 512 (Tex. App. 2002).
· cites it 3× “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.122 (Vernon 1996).”
In Re the Marriage of Eilers, 205 S.W.3d 637 (Tex. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “Therefore, we cannot say that the court abused its discretion by finding the existence of a child support contract for J.”
Kurtz v. Kurtz, 158 S.W.3d 12 (Tex. App. 2005).
“TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.122 (Vernon 2002).”
McGuire v. McGuire, 4 S.W.3d 382 (Tex. App. 1999).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996).”
Grayson v. Grayson, 103 S.W.3d 559 (Tex. App. 2003).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 2002).”
In the Interest of A.B., a Child, 368 S.W.3d 850 (Tex. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 154.122 , .123(a) (West 2008) (providing that trial court may determine application of the statutory guidelines would be “unjust or inappropriate under the circumstances” and may deviate from the guidelines if evidence rebuts the presumption that…”
Johnson v. Johnson, 948 S.W.2d 835 (Tex. App. 1997).
“See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996) (providing that support guidelines are presumed reasonable and order conforming to guidelines is presumed to be in best interest of child).”
Tex. Fam. Code § 154.122(a): 28 cases
Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998).
“See TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.125(b) (Vernon 1996).”
Niskar v. Niskar, 136 S.W.3d 749 (Tex. App. 2004).
“Amount of Child Support In his third issue on appeal, the appellant argues that the amount of child support ordered by the trial court deviates from the statutory guidelines even though the court explicitly stated that it was ordering support according to the guidelines. 1.…”
In Re the Marriage of Eilers, 205 S.W.3d 637 (Tex. App. 2006).
“Therefore, we cannot say that the court abused its discretion by finding the existence of a child support contract for J.”
McGuire v. McGuire, 4 S.W.3d 382 (Tex. App. 1999).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996).”
Grayson v. Grayson, 103 S.W.3d 559 (Tex. App. 2003).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 2002).”
Tex. Fam. Code § 154.122(b): 8 cases
Niskar v. Niskar, 136 S.W.3d 749 (Tex. App. 2004).
“Amount of Child Support In his third issue on appeal, the appellant argues that the amount of child support ordered by the trial court deviates from the statutory guidelines even though the court explicitly stated that it was ordering support according to the guidelines. 1.…”
In Re Ds, 76 S.W.3d 512 (Tex. App. 2002).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.