Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123 (2026)

Additional Factors For Court To Consider

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 154.123. ADDITIONAL FACTORS FOR COURT TO CONSIDER. (a) The court may order periodic child support payments in an amount other than that established by the guidelines if the evidence rebuts the presumption that application of the guidelines is in the best interest of the child and justifies a variance from the guidelines.

(b) In determining whether application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate under the circumstances, the court shall consider evidence of all relevant factors, including:

(1) the age and needs of the child;

(2) the ability of the parents to contribute to the support of the child;

(3) any financial resources available for the support of the child;

(4) the amount of time of possession of and access to a child;

(5) the amount of the obligee's net resources, including the earning potential of the obligee if the actual income of the obligee is significantly less than what the obligee could earn because the obligee is intentionally unemployed or underemployed and including an increase or decrease in the income of the obligee or income that may be attributed to the property and assets of the obligee;

(6) child care expenses incurred by either party in order to maintain gainful employment;

(7) whether either party has the managing conservatorship or actual physical custody of another child;

(8) the amount of alimony or spousal maintenance actually and currently being paid or received by a party;

(9) the expenses for a son or daughter for education beyond secondary school;

(10) whether the obligor or obligee has an automobile, housing, or other benefits furnished by his or her employer, another person, or a business entity;

(11) the amount of other deductions from the wage or salary income and from other compensation for personal services of the parties;

(12) provision for health care insurance and payment of uninsured medical expenses;

(13) special or extraordinary educational, health care, or other expenses of the parties or of the child;

(14) the cost of travel in order to exercise possession of and access to a child;

(15) positive or negative cash flow from any real and personal property and assets, including a business and investments;

(16) debts or debt service assumed by either party; and

(17) any other reason consistent with the best interest of the child, taking into consideration the circumstances of the parents.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 117 cases (23 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 14× “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996).”

Lide v. Lide, 116 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123(a). In determining whether application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate under the circumstances, the court shall consider evidence of all relevant factors, including: • the ages and needs of the children; • the ability of the parents…”

Juan Ayala v. Blanca Edit Ayala, 387 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 3× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 154.123 ( a) (Vernon 2008).”

Niskar v. Niskar, 136 S.W.3d 749 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123(a). See *758 also Lide, 116 S.”

In Re the Marriage of Grossnickle, 115 S.W.3d 238 (Tex. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123 (Vernon 2002).”

In the Interest of M.M., 980 S.W.2d 699 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “; see TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.125 (Vernon 1996) (establishing guidelines *701 according to number of children, where obligor's net resources are less than $6,000 per month); TEX.”

Kurtz v. Kurtz, 158 S.W.3d 12 (Tex. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.123, 154.126 (Vernon 2002).”

In the Interest of P.C.S., 320 S.W.3d 525 (Tex. App. 2010). · cites it 6× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123. C. Application of Law to Facts 1.”

Knight v. Knight, 131 S.W.3d 535 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123(a). A court may order either or both parents to support a child in the manner specified by the order until the child is eighteen years of age or until graduation from high school, whichever occurs later.”

Evans v. Evans, 14 S.W.3d 343 (Tex. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 154.123 (Vernon 1996).”

In Re Guthrie, 45 S.W.3d 719 (Tex. App. 2001). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 154.123 (b)(1)-(17), 154.”

Agraz v. Carnley, 143 S.W.3d 547 (Tex. App. 2004). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123 (Vernon 2002) (providing for child support payments in amounts different from guidelines if evidence rebuts presumption that application of guidelines is in best interest of child and justifies variance from the guidelines).”

Show all 117 citing cases →

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(3) — 2 cases

in the Interest of A.A.G. & C.L.G.G., Child., 303 S.W.3d 739 (Tex. App. 2009).

In Re Aag, 303 S.W.3d 739 (Tex. App. 2009).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(5) — 1 case

James Joseph Rooney v. Sandra Rooney (Tex. App. 2011).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(a) — 26 cases

Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996).”

Knight v. Knight, 131 S.W.3d 535 (Tex. App. 2004). “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123(a). A court may order either or both parents to support a child in the manner specified by the order until the child is eighteen years of age or until graduation from high school, whichever occurs later.”

Niskar v. Niskar, 136 S.W.3d 749 (Tex. App. 2004). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123(a). See *758 also Lide, 116 S.”

Lide v. Lide, 116 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. App. 2003). “Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123(a). In determining whether application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate under the circumstances, the court shall consider evidence of all relevant factors, including: • the ages and needs of the children; • the ability of the parents…”

Juan Ayala v. Blanca Edit Ayala, 387 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 154.123 ( a) (Vernon 2008).”

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b) — 16 cases

Niskar v. Niskar, 136 S.W.3d 749 (Tex. App. 2004). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123(a). See *758 also Lide, 116 S.”

Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996).”

Kurtz v. Kurtz, 158 S.W.3d 12 (Tex. App. 2005). “See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.123, 154.126 (Vernon 2002).”

McGuire v. McGuire, 4 S.W.3d 382 (Tex. App. 1999).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(1) — 6 cases

Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996).”

Bailey v. Bailey, 987 S.W.2d 206 (Tex. App. 1999).

In Re Pcs, 320 S.W.3d 525 (Tex. App. 2010).

Ryan Goyal v. Henna Hora (Tex. App. 2021).

William P. Klages v. Rita E. Klages (Tex. App. 2021).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(10) — 5 cases

Evans v. Evans, 14 S.W.3d 343 (Tex. App. 2000). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 154.123 (Vernon 1996).”

Gaxiola v. Garcia, 169 S.W.3d 426 (Tex. App. 2005).

In the Interest of J.H., 961 S.W.2d 550 (Tex. App. 1997).

In the Interest of P.C.S., 320 S.W.3d 525 (Tex. App. 2010). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123. C. Application of Law to Facts 1.”

In Re Pcs, 320 S.W.3d 525 (Tex. App. 2010).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(12) — 1 case

Fitch, Leanne R. v. Fitch, Carl W. (Tex. App. 2013).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(14) — 1 case

In the Interest of I. J. K. & E. A. K., Child. v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2023).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(16) — 1 case

Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996).”

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(17) — 4 cases

In the Interest of M.M., 980 S.W.2d 699 (Tex. App. 1998). “; see TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.125 (Vernon 1996) (establishing guidelines *701 according to number of children, where obligor's net resources are less than $6,000 per month); TEX.”

Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996).”

in the Interest of A.R.W., a Child (Tex. App. 2019).

William P. Klages v. Rita E. Klages (Tex. App. 2021).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(2) — 2 cases

In the Interest of A.E.C. & A.A.C., Child. v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2025).

Fitch, Leanne R. v. Fitch, Carl W. (Tex. App. 2013).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(3) — 6 cases

In the Interest of P.C.S., 320 S.W.3d 525 (Tex. App. 2010). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123. C. Application of Law to Facts 1.”

Drummond v. State, 714 A.2d 163 (Md. 1998).

in the Interest of E. A. S. & B. M. S., Child., 123 S.W.3d 565 (Tex. App. 2003).

In Re Pcs, 320 S.W.3d 525 (Tex. App. 2010).

In Re Eas, 123 S.W.3d 565 (Tex. App. 2003).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(4) — 3 cases

Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 154.122(a) (Vernon 1996).”

in the Interest of H.O., a Child (Tex. App. 2015).

Fitch, Leanne R. v. Fitch, Carl W. (Tex. App. 2013).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(5) — 4 cases

in the Interest of E. A. S. & B. M. S., Child., 123 S.W.3d 565 (Tex. App. 2003).

In Re Eas, 123 S.W.3d 565 (Tex. App. 2003).

Lide, III, Henry Samuel v. Lide, Deborah Ella (Tex. App. 2003).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(6) — 1 case

Brian Keith MacGillivray v. Georgia Lee MacGillivray (Tex. App. 2011).

— Tex. Fam. Code § 154.123(b)(l) — 1 case

In the Interest of P.C.S., 320 S.W.3d 525 (Tex. App. 2010). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 154.123. C. Application of Law to Facts 1.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.