Tex. Codes » Family Code · TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE E. PROTECTION OF THE CHILD · CHAPTER 263. REVIEW OF PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN UNDER CARE OF DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 263.105 (2026)

Review Of Service Plan; Modification

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 263.105. REVIEW OF SERVICE PLAN; MODIFICATION. (a) The service plan currently in effect shall be filed with the court.

(b) The court shall review the plan at the next required hearing under this chapter after the plan is filed.

(c) The court may modify an original or amended service plan at any time.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1150, Sec. 25, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1390, Sec. 44, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.

Amended by:

Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1071 (S.B. 993), Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2011.

Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1071 (S.B. 993), Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2005 · leading case: In the Interest of C.G.B., A/K/A M.G.K., & J.R.B., A/K/A R.R.K., Child., 163 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In the Interest of C.G.B., A/K/A M.G.K., & J.R.B., A/K/A R.R.K., Child., 163 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005). · cites it 2× “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.102 (Vernon 2002).”
In re CGB, 163 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005). · cites it 2× “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.102 (Vernon 2002).”
Tex. Fam. Code § 263.105(a): 2 cases
In the Interest of C.G.B., A/K/A M.G.K., & J.R.B., A/K/A R.R.K., Child., 163 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005). “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.102 (Vernon 2002).”
In re CGB, 163 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005). “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.102 (Vernon 2002).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.