Sec. 392.404. REMEDIES UNDER OTHER LAW. (a) A violation of this chapter is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter 17, Business & Commerce Code, and is actionable under that subchapter.
(b) This chapter does not affect or alter a remedy at law or in equity otherwise available to a debtor, creditor, governmental entity, or other legal entity.
Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1008, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Notes of Decisions
Biggers v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 767 F. Supp. 2d 725 (N.D. Tex. 2011).
· cites it 2× “¶ 23; Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 392.404(a) (West 2006) (“A violation of this chapter [codifying the TDCPA] is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter 17, Business & Commerce Code [codifying the DTPA], and is actionable under that subchapter.”
Ca Partners v. Spears, 274 S.W.3d 51 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008).
“” See Tex Fin. Code § 392.404(a). Thus, because CA Partners's actions constituted a violation of the Texas Finance Code, the trial court was warranted in doubling Spears's mental anguish damages for a mere "knowing” violation of the DTPA.”
Watson v. Citimortgage, Inc., 814 F. Supp. 2d 726 (E.D. Tex. 2011).
· cites it 2× “10-11, ¶ 33-34; Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 392.404(a) (West 2006) (“A violation of this chapter [the TDCPA] is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter 17, Business & Commerce Code [the DTPA], and is actionable under that sub-chapter.”
Cushman v. GC Servs., LP, 657 F. Supp. 2d 834 (S.D. Tex. 2009).
· cites it 3× “Plaintiff then argues that Tex. Fin.Code § 392.404 acts as a “tie-in” provision allowing “claimants” under “another law” to recover “actual damages,” while DTPA “consumers” are limited to a narrower category of “economic damages.”
Henning, Kenneth v. OneWest Bank FSB, 405 S.W.3d 950 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013).
“50; Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 392.404(a) (“violation of this chapter is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter 17, Business & Commerce Code”).”
Marauder Corp. v. Beall, 301 S.W.3d 817 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010).
“” Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 392.404 (b) (Vernon 2006).”
Brush v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 911 F. Supp. 2d 445 (S.D. Tex. 2012).
“Tex. Fin. Code § 392.404(a). The Brushes argue that because they are “consumers” under the TDCA, they must also be “consumers” under the DTPA.”
Eads v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP, 538 F. Supp. 2d 981 (W.D. Tex. 2008).
“Tex. Fin.Code § 392.404. The DTPA allows a prevailing party to obtain equitable relief, such as an injunction.”
Wallace v. Davis (In Re Davis), 377 B.R. 827 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2007).
“See Tex. Fin.Code § 392.404. 3. Plaintiff’s Claim for Unreasonable Collection Efforts Relating to Mr.”
Tex. Fin. Code § 392.404(a): 18 cases
Biggers v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 767 F. Supp. 2d 725 (N.D. Tex. 2011).
“¶ 23; Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 392.404(a) (West 2006) (“A violation of this chapter [codifying the TDCPA] is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter 17, Business & Commerce Code [codifying the DTPA], and is actionable under that subchapter.”
Ca Partners v. Spears, 274 S.W.3d 51 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008).
“” See Tex Fin. Code § 392.404(a). Thus, because CA Partners's actions constituted a violation of the Texas Finance Code, the trial court was warranted in doubling Spears's mental anguish damages for a mere "knowing” violation of the DTPA.”
Watson v. Citimortgage, Inc., 814 F. Supp. 2d 726 (E.D. Tex. 2011).
“10-11, ¶ 33-34; Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 392.404(a) (West 2006) (“A violation of this chapter [the TDCPA] is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter 17, Business & Commerce Code [the DTPA], and is actionable under that sub-chapter.”
Henning, Kenneth v. OneWest Bank FSB, 405 S.W.3d 950 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013).
“50; Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 392.404(a) (“violation of this chapter is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter 17, Business & Commerce Code”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.