Tex. Codes » Human Resources Code · TITLE 2. HUMAN SERVICES AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES IN GENERAL · SUBTITLE C. ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS · CHAPTER 36. HEALTH CARE PROGRAM FRAUD PREVENTION
Texas Codes

Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101 (2026)

Action By Private Person Authorized

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 36.101. ACTION BY PRIVATE PERSON AUTHORIZED. (a) A person may bring a civil action for a violation of Section 36.002 for the person and for the state. The action shall be brought in the name of the person and of the state.

(b) In an action brought under this subchapter, a person who violates Section 36.002 is liable as provided by Section 36.052.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case: United States ex rel. Rost v. Pfizer Inc., 446 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D. Mass. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States ex rel. Rost v. Pfizer Inc., 446 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D. Mass. 2006). “6, § 1203(b); D.C.Code § 2-308-15(b); Fla. Stat. § 68.083 (2); Haw.”
Richard J. Malouf v. State, 461 S.W.3d 641 (Tex. App.—Austin 2015). “See Tex. Hum. Res. Code §§ 36.101 (authorizing person to bring action for the State), .”
In re Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. the State of Texas, No. 15-25-00207-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Nov. 14, 2025). · cites it 26× “V, § 21 498 Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101 499 Tex. Hum.”
In re Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. the State of Texas, No. 15-25-00207-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Nov. 14, 2025). · cites it 18× “Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101. 18. This Court has jurisdiction over Novartis because Novartis does business in the State of Texas and committed the unlawful acts alleged in this Petition in whole or in part in Texas.”
In re Dr. Robert Tafel, No. 24-1062 (Tex. June 19, 2026). · cites it 5× “” TEX. HUM. RES. CODE §§ 36.101(a) (emphasis added), 36.”
In re Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. the State of Texas, 711 S.W.3d 732 (Tex. App.—15th Dist. 2025). · cites it 3× “” Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101(a); see also Xerox, 555 S.”
In re Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. the State of Texas, No. 15-25-00207-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Nov. 21, 2025). · cites it 3× “22 STATUTES Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101(a) .........”
State of Texas ex rel. Joshua LaFountain v. BLT Mgmt. Co., No. 15-25-00067-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Sept. 19, 2025). · cites it 2× “49 Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.002(13)………………………………………………51 Tex.”
In re Novartis Pharm. Corp., 722 S.W.3d 720 (Tex. 2025). · cites it 2× “” Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101(a); see also id.”
In re Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. the State of Texas, 711 S.W.3d 732 (Tex. App.—15th Dist. 2025). · cites it 2× “2 Tex. Hum. Res. Code §§ 36.101, .110; In re Xerox, 555 S.”
In re Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. the State of Texas, No. 15-25-00207-CV (Apr. 30, 2026). · cites it 2× “66 But “[f]or the Legislature to attempt to authorize a court to act without subject matter jurisdiction would violate the constitutional separation of powers.”67 The real parties point out that 25 years ago the U.”
Permiacare, Ramora Thomas v. L. R. H., 600 S.W.3d 431 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2020). “To do so potentially exposes the provider to a Medicaid Fraud claim under TEX.HUM.RES.CODE ANN. § 36.101, et. seq. (the TMFPA).”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101(a): 10 cases
In re Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. the State of Texas, No. 15-25-00207-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Nov. 14, 2025). “V, § 21 498 Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101 499 Tex. Hum.”
In re Dr. Robert Tafel, No. 24-1062 (Tex. June 19, 2026). “” TEX. HUM. RES. CODE §§ 36.101(a) (emphasis added), 36.”
In re Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. the State of Texas, 711 S.W.3d 732 (Tex. App.—15th Dist. 2025). “” Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101(a); see also Xerox, 555 S.”
State of Texas ex rel. Joshua LaFountain v. BLT Mgmt. Co., No. 15-25-00067-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Sept. 19, 2025). “49 Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.002(13)………………………………………………51 Tex.”
In re Novartis Pharm. Corp., 722 S.W.3d 720 (Tex. 2025). “” Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101(a); see also id.”
Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101(b): 2 cases
In re Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. the State of Texas, No. 15-25-00207-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Nov. 14, 2025). “V, § 21 498 Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101 499 Tex. Hum.”
In re Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. the State of Texas, No. 15-25-00207-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Nov. 21, 2025). “22 STATUTES Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 36.101(a) .........”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.