Texas Codes

Tex. Ins. Code § 862.054 (2026)

Fire Insurance: Breach By Insured; Personal Property Coverage

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 862.054. FIRE INSURANCE: BREACH BY INSURED; PERSONAL PROPERTY COVERAGE. Unless the breach or violation contributed to cause the destruction of the property, a breach or violation by the insured of a warranty, condition, or provision of a fire insurance policy or contract of insurance on personal property, or of an application for the policy or contract:

(1) does not render the policy or contract void; and

(2) is not a defense to a suit for loss.

Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1419, Sec. 1, eff. June 1, 2003.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2023 · leading case: Bob Greene v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 446 S.W.3d 761 (Tex. 2014).
Bob Greene v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 446 S.W.3d 761 (Tex. 2014). · cites it 5× “Greene contends that the vacancy provision should not apply and the policy should cover her loss because: (1) it is unenforceable under an anti-technicality statute, see TEX.”
Am. Risk Ins. Co. v. Serpikova, 522 S.W.3d 497 (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “In the motion, Ser-pikova asserted the following grounds: • (1) as a matter of law the Property falls within the definition of “residence premises” in the Policy and therefore the house is a dwelling on the residence premises and the Policy covers Serpikova’s loss from the fire;…”
AIG Aviation, Inc. v. Holt Helicopters, Inc., 198 S.W.3d 276 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2006). · cites it 2× “TEX. INS.CODE ANN. § 862.054 (Vernon 2003).”
W.W. Rowland Trucking Co. v. CRC Ins. Ser, 559 F. App'x 253 (5th Cir. 2014). · cites it 6× “The district court applied Texas’s Anti-Technicality Statute, Tex. Ins.Code Ann. § 862.054 (West 2013), which requires that there be a causal link between the breach in the policy provision and the loss in order for an insurer to deny a claim under a property insurance policy.”
RLI Ins. Co. v. Costello, 230 F. Supp. 3d 737 (S.D. Tex. 2017). · cites it 3× “Texas Insurance Code § 862.054 Section 862.”
Aig Aviation (Texas), Inc. v. Holt Helicopters, Inc., 248 S.W.3d 169 (Tex. 2008). · cites it 2× “Tex. Ins.Code § 862.054. [11] See generally Noralyn O.”
Mario Santacruz v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's, Inc., 590 F. App'x 384 (5th Cir. 2014). “Tex. Ins.Code Ann. § 862.054; see also Puckett v.”
Bob Greene v. Farmers Ins. Exch., No. 12-0867 (Tex. Aug. 29, 2014). · cites it 2× “In her motion, Greene asserted, in part, that Texas Insurance Code § 862.054 (commonly referred to as the anti- technicality statute) precluded Farmers from raising the vacancy clause as a defense.”
Eads v. Spheric Assurance, No. 23-20066 (5th Cir. Dec. 13, 2023). “305, while Eads and Alia emphasize Texas Insurance Code § 862.054. See 67 F.”
AmGuard Ins. Co. v. Lone Star Legal Aid, No. 4:18-cv-02139 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2020). “TEX. INS. CODE § 862.054. First enacted in 1913, the statute applies “only to those warranties and provisions in policies the breach of which might contribute to or bring about a fire loss.”
Eads v. Spheric Assurance Co. LTD, No. 4:22-cv-04021 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2023). “9 at 2 (citing TEX. INS. CODE § 862.054 (“Unless the breach or violation contributed to cause the destruction of the property, a breach or violation by the insured of a warranty, condition, or provision of a fire insurance policy or contract of insurance on personal property, or…”
AIG Aviation (Texas), Inc. v. Holt Helicopters, Inc., No. 04-05-00291-CV (Tex. App.—San Antonio Apr. 26, 2006). “Tex. Ins. Code Ann. § 862.054 (Vernon 2003).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.