Sec. 21.0021. CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN DEFINITIONS. (a) The term "disability":
(1) shall be construed in favor of broad coverage of individuals under Subchapters B and C, to the maximum extent allowed under those subchapters; and
(2) includes an impairment that is episodic or in remission that substantially limits a major life activity when active.
(b) The determination of whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity must be made without regard to the ameliorative effects of mitigating measures, including:
(1) medication, medical supplies, medical equipment, medical appliances, prosthetic limbs and devices, hearing aids, cochlear implants and other implantable hearing devices, mobility devices, and oxygen therapy equipment;
(2) devices that magnify, enhance, or otherwise augment a visual image, other than eyeglasses and contact lenses that are intended to fully correct visual acuity or eliminate refractive error;
(3) the use of assistive technology;
(4) reasonable accommodations and auxiliary aids or services; and
(5) learned behavioral or adaptive neurological modifications.
Added by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 337 (H.B. 978), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 2012–2026 · leading case:
Molina v. DSI Renal, Inc., 840 F. Supp. 2d 984 (W.D. Tex. 2012).
Texas Dep't of Crim. Just. v. Bibiana Flores, 555 S.W.3d 656 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2018).
“at § 2 (codified at TEX.LABOR CODE ANN. § 21.0021(b)). As with the federal amendments under the ADAAA, the Legislature added a statement that the term disability shall be construed broadly in favor of coverage.”
Datar v. Nat'l Oilwell Varco, L.P., 518 S.W.3d 467 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017).
“It asserted that neither his hypertension nor his lower-back injury substantially limited a major life activity and that Datar was able to perform his work duties throughout his employment at NOV.”
Jonathan Johnson v. Capstone Logistics, LLC, No. 01-23-00221-CV, 2024 WL 5249164 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 31, 2024).
· cites it 3× “”); TEX. LAB. CODE § 21.0021(a)(1) (instructing that the term “disability” “shall be construed in favor of broad coverage.”
Jennifer Nelsen v. Denton Cnty., No. 07-25-00377-CV (June 11, 2026).
· cites it 2× “TEX. LABOR CODE § 21.0021(a)(1). It is unlawful for an employer subject to the anti-discrimination provisions of the TCHRA “to fail or refuse to make a reasonable workplace accommodation to a known physical or mental limitation of an otherwise qualified” employee with a…”
Dallas Cnty. Hosp. Dist. v. Sheri Kowalski, No. 05-21-00379-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 5, 2023).
“” TEX. LAB. CODE § 21.0021(a)(1). The definition of “regarded as having such an impairment” was also added and makes clear that an impairment is not restricted to one that limits major life activities: “Regarded as having such an impairment” means subjected to an action…”
El Paso Cnty. Water Improvement Dist. 1 v. Rogelio Trevizo, 697 S.W.3d 259 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2023).
“”); TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 21.0021(a)(1) (“The term ‘disability’ [] shall be construed in favor of broad coverage of individuals under Subchapters B and C, to the maximum extent allowed under those subchapters[.”
Tex. Lab. Code § 21.0021(a): 1 case
Tex. Lab. Code § 21.0021(a)(1): 6 cases
Jonathan Johnson v. Capstone Logistics, LLC, No. 01-23-00221-CV, 2024 WL 5249164 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 31, 2024).
“”); TEX. LAB. CODE § 21.0021(a)(1) (instructing that the term “disability” “shall be construed in favor of broad coverage.”
Dallas Cnty. Hosp. Dist. v. Sheri Kowalski, No. 05-21-00379-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 5, 2023).
“” TEX. LAB. CODE § 21.0021(a)(1). The definition of “regarded as having such an impairment” was also added and makes clear that an impairment is not restricted to one that limits major life activities: “Regarded as having such an impairment” means subjected to an action…”
El Paso Cnty. Water Improvement Dist. 1 v. Rogelio Trevizo, 697 S.W.3d 259 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2023).
“”); TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 21.0021(a)(1) (“The term ‘disability’ [] shall be construed in favor of broad coverage of individuals under Subchapters B and C, to the maximum extent allowed under those subchapters[.”
Tex. Lab. Code § 21.0021(a)(2): 1 case
Tex. Lab. Code § 21.0021(b): 3 cases
Texas Dep't of Crim. Just. v. Bibiana Flores, 555 S.W.3d 656 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2018).
“at § 2 (codified at TEX.LABOR CODE ANN. § 21.0021(b)). As with the federal amendments under the ADAAA, the Legislature added a statement that the term disability shall be construed broadly in favor of coverage.”
Jonathan Johnson v. Capstone Logistics, LLC, No. 01-23-00221-CV, 2024 WL 5249164 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 31, 2024).
“”); TEX. LAB. CODE § 21.0021(a)(1) (instructing that the term “disability” “shall be construed in favor of broad coverage.”
Jennifer Nelsen v. Denton Cnty., No. 07-25-00377-CV (June 11, 2026).
“TEX. LABOR CODE § 21.0021(a)(1). It is unlawful for an employer subject to the anti-discrimination provisions of the TCHRA “to fail or refuse to make a reasonable workplace accommodation to a known physical or mental limitation of an otherwise qualified” employee with a…”
Tex. Lab. Code § 21.0021(b)(1): 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.