Sec. 406.091. EXEMPT EMPLOYEES; VOLUNTARY COVERAGE. (a) The following employees are not subject to this subtitle:
(1) a person employed as a domestic worker or a casual worker engaged in employment incidental to a personal residence;
(2) a person covered by a method of compensation established under federal law; or
(3) except as provided by Subchapter H, a farm or ranch employee.
(b) An employer may elect to obtain workers' compensation insurance coverage for an employee or classification of employees exempted from coverage under Subsection (a)(1) or (a)(3). Obtaining that coverage constitutes acceptance by the employer of the rights and responsibilities imposed under this subtitle as of the effective date of the coverage for as long as the coverage remains in effect.
(c) An employer who does not obtain coverage for exempt employees is not deprived of the common-law defenses described by Section 406.033, but this section does not reinstate or otherwise affect the availability of those or other defenses at common law.
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.
Notes of Decisions
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Summers, 282 S.W.3d 433 (Tex. 2009).
· cites it 2× “" TEX. LAB.CODE § 406.091(a)(1). The Act exempts such employees from coverage, though it allows employer-homeowners to voluntarily accept the rights and responsibilities of providing such coverage.”
Pierce v. Holiday, 155 S.W.3d 676 (Tex. App. 2005).
“Pierce did not seek worker’s compensation benefits under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 406.091(a)(3) (Vernon 1996), nor did he seek recovery through the Workers’ Compensation Board; and Pierce’s original petition (and each amended petition thereafter)…”
Robertson v. Home State Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co., 348 S.W.3d 273 (Tex. App. 2011).
· cites it 3× “See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 406.091 (a)(1). We conclude and hold that the employee exclusion applied to exclude coverage under the Policy for Robertson’s claims against Redi-Mix.”
Nichols v. Pabtex, Inc., 151 F. Supp. 2d 772 (E.D. Tex. 2001).
“See Tex.Lab.Code Ann. § 406.091(a)(2) (Vernon 1995).”
In Re Shippers Stevedoring Co., 274 S.W.3d 840 (Tex. App. 2008).
· cites it 3× “§ 905 ; Tex Lab.Code Ann. § 406.091. From these premises, Shippers reasons that the U.”
Anaya v. Traylor Bros Inc, 478 F.3d 251 (5th Cir. 2007).
“091(a)(2) of the TWCA prohibits benefits to workers covered by analogous federal laws. The TWCA reads in pertinent part that “a person covered by a method of compensation established under federal law” is not subject to the statute.”
— Tex. Lab. Code § 406.091(a)(1) — 3 cases
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Summers, 282 S.W.3d 433 (Tex. 2009).
“" TEX. LAB.CODE § 406.091(a)(1). The Act exempts such employees from coverage, though it allows employer-homeowners to voluntarily accept the rights and responsibilities of providing such coverage.”
Robertson v. Home State Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co., 348 S.W.3d 273 (Tex. App. 2011).
“See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 406.091 (a)(1). We conclude and hold that the employee exclusion applied to exclude coverage under the Policy for Robertson’s claims against Redi-Mix.”
— Tex. Lab. Code § 406.091(a)(2) — 6 cases
Nichols v. Pabtex, Inc., 151 F. Supp. 2d 772 (E.D. Tex. 2001).
“See Tex.Lab.Code Ann. § 406.091(a)(2) (Vernon 1995).”
Anaya v. Traylor Bros Inc, 478 F.3d 251 (5th Cir. 2007).
“091(a)(2) of the TWCA prohibits benefits to workers covered by analogous federal laws. The TWCA reads in pertinent part that “a person covered by a method of compensation established under federal law” is not subject to the statute.”
— Tex. Lab. Code § 406.091(a)(3) — 1 case
Pierce v. Holiday, 155 S.W.3d 676 (Tex. App. 2005).
“Pierce did not seek worker’s compensation benefits under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 406.091(a)(3) (Vernon 1996), nor did he seek recovery through the Workers’ Compensation Board; and Pierce’s original petition (and each amended petition thereafter)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.