Sec. 2308.202. REGULATION BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF FEES FOR NONCONSENT TOWS. The governing body of a political subdivision may regulate the fees that may be charged or collected in connection with a nonconsent tow originating in the territory of the political subdivision if the private property tow fees:
(1) are authorized by commission rule; and
(2) do not exceed the maximum amount authorized by commission rule.
Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1034, Sec. 10, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Renumbered from Transportation Code, Section 643.203 by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1046 (H.B. 2094), Sec. 2.01, eff. September 1, 2007.
Amended by:
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1310 (H.B. 2571), Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2010.
Notes of Decisions
State v. John D. Deloach, 458 S.W.3d 696 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015).
· cites it 3× “1, 2003 (currently codified in Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 2308.202 , .203 (West 2012)).”
Deloach, John D., No. PD-0382-15 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 3, 2015).
· cites it 4× “8 TEX. OCC. CODE § 2308.202 ...............”
Deloach, John D., No. PD-0382-15 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 3, 2015).
· cites it 3× “Those provisions are now at Tex. Occ. Code §§ 2308.202 and 203. 213723/0002279-24559 4 As indicated by that caption, the enactment covered multiple aspects of the towing industry.”
State v. John D. Deloach, No. 04-14-00324-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 19, 2014).
· cites it 2× “1, 2003 (currently codified in TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. §§ 2308.202, .203 (West 2012)).”
Landry Rountree v. State, No. 13-12-00063-CR, 2012 WL 3612497 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 23, 2012).
· cites it 2× “See TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 2308.202 (West Supp.”
Wilfredo Amaro v. Wilson Cnty., TX, Albert Gamez, No. 04-11-00061-CV (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 14, 2011).
“That statute provides: The governing body of a political subdivision may regulate the fees that may be charged or collected in connection with a nonconsent tow originating in the territory of the political subdivision if the private property tow fees: (1) are authorized by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.