Sec. 37.07. IRREGULARITIES NO DEFENSE. (a) It is no defense to prosecution under Section 37.02 (Perjury) or 37.03 (Aggravated Perjury) that the oath was administered or taken in an irregular manner, or that there was some irregularity in the appointment or qualification of the person who administered the oath.
(b) It is no defense to prosecution under Section 37.02 (Perjury) or 37.03 (Aggravated Perjury) that a document was not sworn to if the document contains a recital that it was made under oath, the declarant was aware of the recital when he signed the document, and the document contains the signed jurat of a public servant authorized to administer oaths.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Notes of Decisions
Chase Erick Wheeler v. State, 573 S.W.3d 437 (Tex. App. 2019).
“(citing Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 37.07 (b)). Bonner testified that he was not aware his affidavit needed to be sworn at the time he made the affidavit.”
Hardy, Dearl (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).
“" (4) However, the court of appeals overlooked Texas Penal Code §37.07(b), which did not exist at the time Lowry was decided, and which provides: It is no defense to prosecution under Section 37.”
Raegan D. Ashcraft v. State (Tex. App. 2013).
“Although this would be a simpler case if McWherter had verbally recited the oath to Officer Kline, we nonetheless conclude that these statements and the accompanying signatures, when considered in their totality, support the trial court’s finding that the affidavit, if later…”
Desilets, Paul Ray (Tex. App. 2015).
“Violated Tex. Penal Code § 37.07(a)(2), tampering with or fabricating physical evidence.”
— Tex. Penal Code § 37.07(a)(2) — 1 case
Desilets, Paul Ray (Tex. App. 2015).
“Violated Tex. Penal Code § 37.07(a)(2), tampering with or fabricating physical evidence.”
— Tex. Penal Code § 37.07(b) — 3 cases
Hardy, Dearl (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).
“" (4) However, the court of appeals overlooked Texas Penal Code §37.07(b), which did not exist at the time Lowry was decided, and which provides: It is no defense to prosecution under Section 37.”
Raegan D. Ashcraft v. State (Tex. App. 2013).
“Although this would be a simpler case if McWherter had verbally recited the oath to Officer Kline, we nonetheless conclude that these statements and the accompanying signatures, when considered in their totality, support the trial court’s finding that the affidavit, if later…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.