Texas Codes
Tex. Penal Code § 49.045 (2026)
Driving While Intoxicated With Child Passenger
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 49.045. DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED WITH CHILD PASSENGER. (a) A person commits an offense if:
(1) the person is intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place; and
(2) the vehicle being operated by the person is occupied by a passenger who is younger than 15 years of age.
(b) An offense under this section is a state jail felony.
Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 787, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 84
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case: Bigon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
Bigon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). “TEX. PEN. CODE ANN. § 49.045. Because this statute clearly dispenses with a culpable mental state, the court held that the felony murder charge also did not require a culpable mental state and upheld the trial court's decision not to quash the indictments.”
Houston v. State, 201 S.W.3d 212 (Tex. App. 2006). “The indictment also alleged appellant had been previously convicted of (1) felony attempted possession of a controlled substance and (2) felony possession of a controlled substance. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the primary offense, and a plea of true to the enhancement…”
Kimberly Gonzalez v. State, 516 S.W.3d 18 (Tex. App. 2016). “See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.045 (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.”
Pointe v. State, 371 S.W.3d 527 (Tex. App. 2012). “A person is intoxicated when he does not have the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol into the body. Id. § 49.01(2)(A) (West 2011). A deadly weapon includes anything that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of…”
Loredana Bertolotti Gore v. State, 451 S.W.3d 182 (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex Penal Code Ann. § 49.045 (Vernon 2011).”
State v. Guzman, 182 S.W.3d 389 (Tex. App. 2005). “Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 49.045 (West Supp.2005).”
Case Cooper Nelson v. State, 504 S.W.3d 410 (Tex. App. 2016). “Tex Penal Code § 49.045 (West 2011). The trial court assessed Appellant’s punishment at confinement for six months and a fine in the amount of $1,500.”
Bell v. State, 485 S.W.3d 663 (Tex. App. 2016). “Tex Penal Code Ann. § 49.045 (West 2011).”
Gonzalez, Kimberly (Tex. App. 2016). “5 iii Tex. Penal Code § 49.045. ...............”
Lauren Olsen v. State (Tex. App. 2020). “She argues that the jury should have been instructed that if it resolved these disputed fact issues in her favor, it was then required to disregard the laboratory results of her post-arrest blood draw because this evidence was illegally obtained.”
Gore, Loredana Bertolotti (Tex. App. 2015). “10 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.045. . . . . . .”
Tara Carson Lane v. State (Tex. App. 2015). “Specifically, Lane asserts that the trial court erred by: (1) admitting the results of her blood test; (2) denying her request for a jury charge under article 38.23 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, see TEX.”
— Tex. Penal Code § 49.045(a) — 6 cases
Lauren Olsen v. State (Tex. App. 2020). “She argues that the jury should have been instructed that if it resolved these disputed fact issues in her favor, it was then required to disregard the laboratory results of her post-arrest blood draw because this evidence was illegally obtained.”
Srihari Avula v. State (Tex. App. 2015).
Gonzalez, Kimberly (Tex. App. 2016). “5 iii Tex. Penal Code § 49.045. ...............”
Malarie Godoy v. State (Tex. App. 2018).
Felecia Rae Suetos v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2021).
— Tex. Penal Code § 49.045(a)(1) — 2 cases
Kenton Fryer v. State (Tex. App. 2019).
Gore, Loredana Bertolotti (Tex. App. 2015). “10 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.045. . . . . . .”
— Tex. Penal Code § 49.045(b) — 2 cases
Keonnis Rachael Velmesh Johnson v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2022).
Tiffany Ann Fleming v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.