Tex. Codes » Penal Code · TITLE 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY · CHAPTER 9. JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
Texas Codes

Tex. Penal Code § 9.03 (2026)

Confinement As Justifiable Force

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 9.03. CONFINEMENT AS JUSTIFIABLE FORCE. Confinement is justified when force is justified by this chapter if the actor takes reasonable measures to terminate the confinement as soon as he knows he safely can unless the person confined has been arrested for an offense.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2021 · leading case: Smith v. State, 352 S.W.3d 55 (Tex. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. State, 352 S.W.3d 55 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “3d at 101 ; see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 9.03 ; id. §§ 9.22, .”
Kenny v. State, 292 S.W.3d 89 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 9.03 (Vernon 2003); see also Adelman v.”
James Lawrence Smith v. State (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “3d at 101 ; see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 9.03 ; id. §§ 9.22, .”
James Lawrence Smith v. State (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “3d at 101 ; see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 9.03 ; id. §§ 9.22, .”
Manxfred Jose Gonzalez v. State (Tex. App. 2021). “See Tex. Penal Code §§ 9.03, .22, .34. The State argues that the evidence did not raise an issue as to “imminent harm” or “immediate necessity” and that, therefore, appellant was not entitled to his requested instructions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.