Sec. 546.001. PERMISSIBLE CONDUCT. In operating an authorized emergency vehicle the operator may:
(1) park or stand, irrespective of another provision of this subtitle;
(2) proceed past a red or stop signal or stop sign, after slowing as necessary for safe operation;
(3) exceed a maximum speed limit, except as provided by an ordinance adopted under Section 545.365, as long as the operator does not endanger life or property; and
(4) disregard a regulation governing the direction of movement or turning in specified directions.
Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
Notes of Decisions
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Sparks, 347 S.W.3d 834 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2011).
· cites it 4× “” See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 546.001. In his deposition testimony, Price was asked the basis for his conclusion that Hallett violated section 546.”
City of Pasadena v. Belle, 297 S.W.3d 525 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009).
· cites it 3× “See generally Tex. Transp. Code Ann. §§ 546.001 -.005 (Vernon 1999 & Supp.”
City of Pasadena v. Kuhn, 260 S.W.3d 93 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2008).
· cites it 2× “Any intersection that an officer attempts to traverse when responding to an emergency is potentially a “blind intersection.” That is why the statute provides that an emergency vehicle may proceed through a stop fight after “slowing as necessary.”
City of Amarillo v. Martin, 971 S.W.2d 426 (Tex. 1998).
· cites it 2× “6701d, § 24(c)(2) (repealed 1995) (current version at TEX. TRANSP. CODE § 546.001(2)). Therefore, the dissent should conclude that Clark is insulated from liability for any conduct short of recklessness.”
Smith v. Janda ex rel. Janda, 126 S.W.3d 543 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003).
· cites it 2× “2d at 431 (citing Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 546.001 (2)). Thus, "an emergency vehicle operator responding to an emergency call is allowed to proceed against a red traffic light after slowing for safe operation.”
Martinez v. Harris Cnty., 526 S.W.3d 557 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017).
· cites it 2× “” Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 546.001 (3) (West 2011).”
Green v. City of Friendswood, 22 S.W.3d 588 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000).
“Tex. TRAns. Code Ann. § 546.001 (3), (4) (Vernon 1999 & Supp.”
Tex. Transp. Code § 546.001(2): 27 cases
City of Amarillo v. Martin, 971 S.W.2d 426 (Tex. 1998).
“6701d, § 24(c)(2) (repealed 1995) (current version at TEX. TRANSP. CODE § 546.001(2)). Therefore, the dissent should conclude that Clark is insulated from liability for any conduct short of recklessness.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Sparks, 347 S.W.3d 834 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2011).
“” See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 546.001. In his deposition testimony, Price was asked the basis for his conclusion that Hallett violated section 546.”
Martinez v. Harris Cnty., 526 S.W.3d 557 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017).
“” Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 546.001 (3) (West 2011).”
Tex. Transp. Code § 546.001(3): 7 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.