Tex. Codes » Transportation Code · TITLE 7. VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC · SUBTITLE J. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS · CHAPTER 724. IMPLIED CONSENT
Texas Codes

Tex. Transp. Code § 724.015 (2026)

Information Provided By Officer Before Requesting Specimen; Statement Of Consent

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 724.015. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OFFICER BEFORE REQUESTING SPECIMEN; STATEMENT OF CONSENT. (a) Before requesting a person to submit to the taking of a specimen, the officer shall inform the person orally and in writing that:

(1) if the person refuses to submit to the taking of the specimen, that refusal may be admissible in a subsequent prosecution;

(2) if the person refuses to submit to the taking of the specimen, the person's license to operate a motor vehicle will be automatically suspended, whether or not the person is subsequently prosecuted as a result of the arrest, for not less than 180 days;

(3) if the person refuses to submit to the taking of a specimen, the officer may apply for a warrant authorizing a specimen to be taken from the person;

(4) if the person is 21 years of age or older and submits to the taking of a specimen designated by the officer and an analysis of the specimen shows the person had an alcohol concentration of a level specified by Chapter 49, Penal Code, the person's license to operate a motor vehicle will be automatically suspended for not less than 90 days, whether or not the person is subsequently prosecuted as a result of the arrest;

(5) if the person is younger than 21 years of age and has any detectable amount of alcohol in the person's system, the person's license to operate a motor vehicle will be automatically suspended for not less than 60 days even if the person submits to the taking of the specimen, but that if the person submits to the taking of the specimen and an analysis of the specimen shows that the person had an alcohol concentration less than the level specified by Chapter 49, Penal Code, the person may be subject to criminal penalties less severe than those provided under that chapter;

(6) if the officer determines that the person is a resident without a license to operate a motor vehicle in this state, the department will deny to the person the issuance of a license, whether or not the person is subsequently prosecuted as a result of the arrest, under the same conditions and for the same periods that would have applied to a revocation of the person's driver's license if the person had held a driver's license issued by this state;

(7) the person has a right to a hearing on the suspension or denial if, not later than the 15th day after the date on which the person receives the notice of suspension or denial or on which the person is considered to have received the notice by mail as provided by law, the department receives, at its headquarters in Austin, a written demand, including a facsimile transmission, or a request in another form prescribed by the department for the hearing; and

(8) if the person submits to the taking of a blood specimen, the specimen will be retained and preserved in accordance with Article 38.50, Code of Criminal Procedure.

(b) If a person consents to the request of an officer to submit to the taking of a specimen, the officer shall request the person to sign a statement that:

(1) the officer requested that the person submit to the taking of a specimen;

(2) the person was informed of the consequences of not submitting to the taking of a specimen; and

(3) the person voluntarily consented to the taking of a specimen.

Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1013, Sec. 34, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 444, Sec. 8, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.

Amended by:

Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 674 (S.B. 1787), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2011.

Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., Ch. 840 (S.B. 335), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2021.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 226 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: Rodriguez v. State, 191 S.W.3d 428 (Tex. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rodriguez v. State, 191 S.W.3d 428 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Alford, 154 S.W.3d 133 (Tex. App. 2005). · cites it 10× “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
State v. Woehst, 175 S.W.3d 329 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 9× “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
Fienen, Casey Ray, 390 S.W.3d 328 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “, Tex. TRansp. Code § 724.015. Therefore, under the totality of circumstances, there is clear and convincing evidence that Appellant made a conscious and voluntary decision to consent to the breathalyzer test.”
State v. Neesley, 239 S.W.3d 780 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] Form DIC-24, contained within the clerk's record, is the written component of the statutory warning required in cases where a peace officer requests a voluntary blood or breath specimen from a person.”
Linton v. State, 275 S.W.3d 493 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE § 724.015; State v. Neesley, 239 S.”
Martin v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 964 S.W.2d 772 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.015 (West 1998).”
Harrison v. State, 205 S.W.3d 549 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “[21] TEX. TRANSP. CODE § 724.015. [22] Griffith v.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Hutcheson, 235 S.W.3d 312 (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Trans. Code Ann. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Struve, 79 S.W.3d 796 (Tex. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “Laws 1821 (amended 1997) (current version at Tex.Transp.Code Ann. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
Ness v. State, 152 S.W.3d 759 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.015 (l)-(2) (Vernon Supp.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Caruana, 363 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2012). · cites it 2× “[5] TEX. TRANSP. CODE § 724.015 (before requesting that a person submit to the taking of a specimen, an officer shall inform the person, orally and in writing, of, e.”
Show all 226 citing cases →
— Tex. Transp. Code § 724.015(1) — 10 cases
State v. Woehst, 175 S.W.3d 329 (Tex. App. 2004). “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
Rodriguez v. State, 191 S.W.3d 428 (Tex. App. 2006). “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
Casey Ray Fienen v. State (Tex. App. 2011).
Cook, Justin (Tex. App. 2015).
Carlton Leon Proctor v. State (Tex. App. 2020).
— Tex. Transp. Code § 724.015(2) — 2 cases
State v. Woehst, 175 S.W.3d 329 (Tex. App. 2004). “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Sergio Roberto Narvaez (Tex. App. 2014).
— Tex. Transp. Code § 724.015(3) — 13 cases
Fienen, Casey Ray, 390 S.W.3d 328 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). “, Tex. TRansp. Code § 724.015. Therefore, under the totality of circumstances, there is clear and convincing evidence that Appellant made a conscious and voluntary decision to consent to the breathalyzer test.”
Rodriguez v. State, 191 S.W.3d 428 (Tex. App. 2006). “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Butler, 960 S.W.2d 375 (Tex. App. 1998).
Martin v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 964 S.W.2d 772 (Tex. App. 1998). “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.015 (West 1998).”
State v. Woehst, 175 S.W.3d 329 (Tex. App. 2004). “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
— Tex. Transp. Code § 724.015(4) — 3 cases
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Alford, 154 S.W.3d 133 (Tex. App. 2005). “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
Han Song v. State (Tex. App. 2015).
State v. Lauren Christine Klein (Tex. App. 2010).
— Tex. Transp. Code § 724.015(5) — 1 case
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Alford, 154 S.W.3d 133 (Tex. App. 2005). “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.015 (Vernon Supp.”
— Tex. Transp. Code § 724.015(a) — 1 case
Adimora-Nweke v. McGraw (5th Cir. 2024).
— Tex. Transp. Code § 724.015(a)(6) — 1 case
Adimora-Nweke v. McGraw (5th Cir. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.