Sec. 724.061. ADMISSIBILITY OF REFUSAL OF PERSON TO SUBMIT TO TAKING OF SPECIMEN. A person's refusal of a request by an officer to submit to the taking of a specimen of breath or blood, whether the refusal was express or the result of an intentional failure to give the specimen, may be introduced into evidence at the person's trial.
Bartlett v. State, 270 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). · cites it 4דAt trial, the evidence of his refusal to submit to a breath test was admitted into evidence under Texas Transportation Code Section 724.061.”
Rodriguez v. State, 191 S.W.3d 428 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006). · cites it 6ד[25] TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 724.061 (Vernon 1999).”
Standefer v. State, 59 S.W.3d 177 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). · cites it 2דSee TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC., Art. 38.14. [28] Judge Johnson makes a number of unsound arguments in her dissent.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Gilfeather, 293 S.W.3d 875 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009). · cites it 4ד[2] See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.061 (Vernon 1999).”
Zavala v. State, 89 S.W.3d 134 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2002). · cites it 2דEven though the evidence is sufficient to show appellant was intoxicated at the time of his arrest, and that he did drive a vehicle, the question more precisely before us is whether we must consider whether the evidence is sufficient to show that appellant drove while he was…”
Williams v. State, 946 S.W.2d 886 (Tex. App.—Waco 1997). · cites it 2דLaws 1025 , 1871 (current version at Tex Transp. Code Ann. § 724.061 (Vernon Supp.”
Jacob Matthew Kiffe v. State, 361 S.W.3d 104 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011). “See Tex. Transp. Code § 724.061; Bartlett v. State, 270 S.”
Vargas v. State, 271 S.W.3d 338 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008). · cites it 4דApplication of Texas Transportation Code Section 724.061 Vargas concedes that his refusal to submit to a breath test is admissible evidence, but argues that the trial court may not instruct the jury regarding the defendant’s failure to submit to a breath test.”
Lewis v. State, 191 S.W.3d 335 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006). · cites it 2דThe odor of an alcoholic beverage on Lewis's breath and his bloodshot eyes are indicators of intoxication. And finally, Lewis's refusal to provide a breath specimen for the intoxilyzer at the county jail may be considered as evidence of intoxication.”
Brodrick Dechone Delane v. State, 369 S.W.3d 412 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012). · cites it 2דref'd) (concluding that officer’s testimony “that an individual is intoxicated is probative evidence of intoxication”); see also Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.061 (Vernon 2011) (“A person’s refusal of a request by an officer to submit to the taking of a specimen of breath or…”
Perez v. State, 495 S.W.3d 374 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016). “Tex. Transp. Code § 724.061 (West 2011); see also Bartlett v.”
Donna Jean Dill v. State, 355 S.W.3d 778 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011). “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 724.061 (Vernon 2011); Bartlett, 270 S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.