Texas Codes
Tex. Util. Code § 105.001 (2026)
Right To Judicial Review
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 105.001. RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW. (a) Any party to a proceeding before the railroad commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.
(b) The issue of confiscation is determined by a preponderance of the evidence.
Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 166, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2023 · leading case: R.R. Comm'n v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean Water, 336 S.W.3d 619 (Tex. 2011).
R.R. Comm'n v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean Water, 336 S.W.3d 619 (Tex. 2011). “See TEX. UTIL. CODE § 105.001(a) ("Any party to a proceeding before the railroad commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.”
City of Port Neches v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas, 212 S.W.3d 565 (Tex. App. 2006). “178 (West 2000); Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 105.001 (West 1998).”
Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean Water v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas, 254 S.W.3d 492 (Tex. App. 2008). “See Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 105.001 (West 2007); ENTEX v.”
Entex v. R.R. Com'n of Texas, 18 S.W.3d 858 (Tex. App. 2000). “See Tex. UtiLCode Ann. § 105.001 (West 1998).”
R.R. Comm'n v. Texas Coast Utils. Coalition, 357 S.W.3d 731 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 105.001; see also Tex.”
Ring Energy v. Trey Res., Inc., 546 S.W.3d 199 (Tex. App. 2017). “See TEX.UTIL.CODE ANN. § 105.001(a) (West 2007)("Any party to a proceeding before the railroad commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.”
NGL Water Solutions Eagle Ford, LLC v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas & Blue Water Disposal (Tex. App. 2019). “As support for its position, the Railroad Commission cites section 105.”
Citizens Against the Landfill in Hempstead Michael McCall Wayne Knox & the City of Hempstead v. Texas Comm'n on Env't Quality & Pintail Landfill, L.L.C. (Tex. App. 2015). “174 and Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 105.001 ; further, the Commission did not err by including the gas utility's costs in acquiring its predecessor as a known and measurable change" in its gas rate award because nothing in Tex.”
Roland Oil Co. v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Util. Code § 105.001(a) (granting party to Commission proceeding the right to judicial review); Tex.”
City of Port Neches, City of Nederland, City of Groves, & Texas Gas Serv. Co. v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas (Tex. App. 2006). “178 (West 2000); Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 105.001 (West 1998).”
City of Port Neches, City of Nederland, City of Groves, & Texas Gas Serv. Co. v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas (Tex. App. 2006). “178 (West 2000); Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 105.001 (West 1998).”
the R.R. Comm'n of Texas CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A CenterPoint Energy Entex & CenterPoint Energy Texas Gas v. Gulf Coast Coalition of Cities (Tex. App. 2016). “174 (establishing standard for review under substantial-evidence rule); Tex. Util. Code § 105.001 (providing that any party to proceeding before Commission is entitled to judicial review under substantial-evidence rule).”
— Tex. Util. Code § 105.001(a) — 6 cases
R.R. Comm'n v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean Water, 336 S.W.3d 619 (Tex. 2011). “See TEX. UTIL. CODE § 105.001(a) ("Any party to a proceeding before the railroad commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.”
Ring Energy v. Trey Res., Inc., 546 S.W.3d 199 (Tex. App. 2017). “See TEX.UTIL.CODE ANN. § 105.001(a) (West 2007)("Any party to a proceeding before the railroad commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.”
NGL Water Solutions Eagle Ford, LLC v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas & Blue Water Disposal (Tex. App. 2019). “As support for its position, the Railroad Commission cites section 105.”
Roland Oil Co. v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Util. Code § 105.001(a) (granting party to Commission proceeding the right to judicial review); Tex.”
R.R. Comm'n of Texas v. Apache Corp. (Tex. App. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.