Whenever a bill, order, resolution, or vote of the Senate and House of Representatives, having been approved by the President, or not having been returned by him with his objections, becomes a law or takes effect, it shall forthwith be received by the Archivist of the United States from the President; and whenever a bill, order, resolution, or vote is returned by the President with his objections, and, on being reconsidered, is agreed to be passed, and is approved by two-thirds of both Houses of Congress, and thereby becomes a law or takes effect, it shall be received by the Archivist of the United States from the President of the Senate, or Speaker of the House of Representatives in whichsoever House it shall last have been so approved, and he shall carefully preserve the originals.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases, 1970–2005 · leading case:
Burke v. Barnes, 479 U.S. 361 (1987).
Burke v. Barnes, 479 U.S. 361 (1987).
· cites it 2× “4042 in the Statutes at Large as a duly enacted law, in accordance with the provisions of 1 U. S. C. §§ 106a and 112 (1982 ed., Supp.”
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc., 496 U.S. 661 (1990).
· cites it 2× “" 1 U. S. C. § 106a (emphasis added). This latter usage, which is probably the more common one, seems also the more natural in the present context.”
Kennedy v. Sampson, 364 F. Supp. 1075 (D.D.C. 1973).
· cites it 6× “Under the provisions of 1 U.S.C. § 106a, 1 U.S.C. § 112 and 1 U.S.”
Kennedy v. Jones, 412 F. Supp. 353 (D.D.C. 1976).
“14225, became validly enacted laws of the United States in accordance with Article I, Section 7, Clause 2 of the Constitution, and requests that this Court order defendants to publish these bills as laws pursuant to 1 U.S.C. §§ 106a, 112 and 113. Defendants have moved to dismiss…”
Barnes v. Carmen, 582 F. Supp. 163 (D.D.C. 1984).
“Plaintiffs allege, and defendants acknowledge, that defendant Geisler has a duty to deliver acts of Congress that have become law to the General Services Administration for publication, and defendant Carmen has a duty, under 1 U.S.C. §§ 106a, 112, and 113 (1982), to publish them.”
Bates v. Nicholson (Fed. Cir. 2005).
· cites it 2× “2; 1 U.S.C. § 106a (2000).3 Congress has also made clear that such laws, once duly enacted, are to be published in the Statutes at Large.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.