The Archivist of the United States shall cause to be compiled, edited, indexed, and published, the United States Statutes at Large, which shall contain all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during each regular session of Congress; all proclamations by the President in the numbered series issued since the date of the adjournment of the regular session of Congress next preceding; and also any amendments to the Constitution of the United States proposed or ratified pursuant to article V thereof since that date, together with the certificate of the Archivist of the United States issued in compliance with the provision contained in section 106b of this title. In the event of an extra session of Congress, the Archivist of the United States shall cause all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during said extra session to be consolidated with, and published as part of, the contents of the volume for the next regular session. The United States Statutes at Large shall be legal evidence of laws, concurrent resolutions, treaties, international agreements other than treaties, proclamations by the President, and proposed or ratified amendments to the Constitution of the United States therein contained, in all the courts of the United States, the several States, and the Territories and insular possessions of the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
37
cases (
10 in the last 5 years), 1955–2025 · leading case:
Blausey v. U.S. Tr., 552 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2009).
Blausey v. U.S. Tr., 552 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2009).
· cites it 2× “§ 101 (10A)(A), we do not reach the question of whether they are also income under § 101(10A)(B). [1] The majority agrees, and neither party contests, that the temporary procedural requirements set forth in Pub.”
Am. Lung Ass'n v. EPA, 985 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2021).
· cites it 2× “1 U.S.C. § 112 ; see id. § 204(a) (United States Code provides only prima facie evidence of the federal law).”
Gary Glenn v. Eric Holder, Jr., 690 F.3d 417 (6th Cir. 2012).
· cites it 2× “2005); see 1 U.S.C. § 112 . A statute and its uncodified provisions are construed to “work together.”
State of Illinois v. David Ferriero, 60 F.4th 704 (D.C. Cir. 2023).
“]” 1 U.S.C. § 112 . B. After suffering defeats in their efforts to obtain constitutional protection for women’s rights, see, e.”
Cameron v. McDonough, 1 F.4th 992 (Fed. Cir. 2021).
· cites it 2× “439, 448 (1993) (citing 1 U.S.C. §§ 112 , 204(a)). This court addressed a sim- ilar issue in Conyers v.”
Svc. Professionals v. Allstate Ins., 300 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2002).
“1 U.S.C. § 112 . [Section 1981] is not itself an Act of Congress; rather, it is a codification of two prior Acts.”
Gonzalez v. Vill. of West Milwaukee, 671 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2012).
“See 1 U.S.C. § 112 ; Mary Whisner, The United States Code, Prima Facie Evidence, and Positive Law, 101 Law Libr.”
Smith v. Comm'r, 275 F.3d 912 (10th Cir. 2001).
“Conclusion The stipulated facts reveal nothing more than an inadvertent mistake on the part of the IRS that caused no prejudice to the taxpayers. The circumstances of this case provide no basis for treating the notice of deficiency as invalid.”
Madhat Zubi v. At&t Corp, 219 F.3d 220 (3rd Cir. 2000).
“1 U.S.C. § 112 . The phrase “arising under” is of course familiar in the field of federal jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.