1 U.S.C. § 205
Codes and Supplement; where printed; form and style; ancillaries
The publications provided for in sections 202, 203 of this title shall be printed at the Government Publishing Office and shall be in such form and style and with such ancillaries as may be prescribed by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives. The Librarian of Congress is directed to cooperate with such committee in the preparation of such ancillaries. Such publications shall be furnished with such thumb insets and other devices to distinguish parts, with such facilities for the insertion of additional matter, and with such explanatory and advertising slips, and shall be printed on such paper and bound in such material, as may be prescribed by such committee.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1934–1972 · leading case: Cont'l Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 72 F.2d 443 (7th Cir. 1934).
Cont'l Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 72 F.2d 443 (7th Cir. 1934). “All controverted issues concern the validity and propriety of the order restraining the sale of the pledged collateral and are directed to: First, the District Court’s jurisdiction as a court of bankruptcy, before the 1933 amendment, to issue such an injunction; Second, its…”
United States v. Gen. Douglas MacArthur Senior Vill., Inc., 337 F. Supp. 955 (E.D.N.Y 1972). “667 , It is placed in the United States Code — apparently as prescribed by the Committee on Judiciary of the House of Representatives ( 1 U.S.C. § 205 ) — in the preliminary material before subchapter I of chapter 13 of title 12 with a variety of provisions dealing with housing…”
Arkansas Corp. Comm'n v. Thompson, 116 F.2d 179 (8th Cir. 1940). “The Missouri Pacific Railroad Company is the debtor in proceedings under Section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, Í1 U.S.C.A. § 205, for the reorganization of a railroad pending in the federal district court' in Missouri, and has extensive properties in Arkansas.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.