10 U.S.C. § 10209
Regular and reserve components: discrimination prohibited
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 277 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, § 1661(a)(2)(A).
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1998–1998 · leading case: Willenbring v. Neurauter, 48 M.J. 152 (C.A.A.F. 1998).
Willenbring v. Neurauter, 48 M.J. 152 (C.A.A.F. 1998). “e also note that interpreting the statutes in a manner that would subject Reserves to a greater amenability to court-martial jurisdiction than Regulars — absent a clear indication that Congress intended to do so — would be inconsistent with the general congressional policy that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.