10 U.S.C. § 1169
Regular enlisted members: limitations on discharge
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 70
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1969–2025 · leading case: Lippmann v. United States, 127 Fed. Cl. 238 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
Lippmann v. United States, 127 Fed. Cl. 238 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “§ 204 ; 10 U.S.C. § 1169 ; 14 U.S.C. § 357 . MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRIGGSBY, Judge I.”
Strickland v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 684 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “Three Sets Of Regulations Have Been Promulgated, Pursuant To 10 U.S.C. § 1169 , Governing Administrative Separation.”
Philip L. Anderson v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 572 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “Statutory Authority Not Exceeded In the complaint, plaintiffs cite 10 U.S.C. § 1169 (2006) as the statute that was contravened in the ERB process.”
United States v. Hart, 66 M.J. 273 (C.A.A.F. 2008). “10 U.S.C. § 1169 . In King, this court reasoned: We read these statutes as generally requiring that three elements be satisfied to accomplish an early discharge.”
Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Gov't, Dep't of the Army, 988 F.2d 1199 (Fed. Cir. 1993). “or (3) as otherwise provided by law.” See also Army Reg. 635-200 (1984).”
Chambers v. United States, 417 F.3d 1218 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “the Secretary may retire the member, with retired pay ....”
Walch v. Adjutant Gen.'s Dep't, 533 F.3d 289 (5th Cir. 2008). “10 U.S.C. § 1169 . That is irrelevant here.”
Anderson v. United States, 758 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “Appellants contend that “no cause was prescribed by the Secretary for discharge of the Plaintiffs.”
Craft v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 170 (Ct. Cl. 1976). “Third, plaintiff claims that the Army’s conduct violated 10 U.S.C. § 1169 (1970) (circumscribing the occasions when a military serviceman may be discharged before the termination of his service contract).”
United States v. King, 27 M.J. 327 (1989). “10 USC § 1169 . We read these statutes as generally requiring that three elements be satisfied to accomplish an early discharge.”
Wyatt v. United States, 23 Cl. Ct. 314 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “Specifically, Wyatt was discharged under AR 635-200, Chap. 13, governing “Separation for Unsatisfactory Performance.”
Webb v. United States, 67 M.J. 765 (A.F.C.C.A. 2009). “The latter requirements stem from 10 U.S.C. § 1169 , which provides in pertinent part as follows: “No regular enlisted member of an armed force may be discharged before his term of service expires, except .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.