10 U.S.C. § 12313
Reserves: release from active duty
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
681(a) 681(b) | 50:967(a). 50:967 (less (a)). | |
In subsection (a), the word “title” is substituted for the word “chapter”. The provisions of this title relating to active duty of Reserves are based on the Armed Forces Reserve Act of 1952. The words “under his jurisdiction” are inserted for clarity. The words “or active duty for training” are omitted as covered by the words “active duty”.
Subsection (b) is substituted for 50:967(b). Clause (3) is inserted, since other provisions of law are necessarily exceptions to the general rule here stated.
1994—Pub. L. 103–337 renumbered section 681 of this title as this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2000–2005 · leading case: McMullen v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 718 (Fed. Cl. 2001).
McMullen v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 718 (Fed. Cl. 2001). “”) gives the Secretary of the Army the discretion to release a Reserve from active duty at any time. Regrettably, the Plaintiff fails to address the Defendant’s nonjusticiability argument, but instead seems to conflate the concept of justiciability with jurisdiction.”
United States v. Wilson, 53 M.J. 327 (C.A.A.F. 2000). “See 10 USC § 12313 (a). The period of federal service also may be extended by federal officials with the consent of state authorities under 10 USC § 12301 (d).”
Sutton v. United States, 65 Fed. Cl. 800 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “Defendant correctly points out that rather than being discharged, Sutton was involuntarily released from active duty pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 12313 and paragraph 2-31 of Army Reg.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.