10 U.S.C. § 2207
Renumbered § 4651]
[renumbered]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1991–2010 · leading case: Francis E. Heydt Co. v. United States of Am., & Richard Cheney, Sec'y of Def., United States Dep't of Def., 948 F.2d 672 (10th Cir. 1991).
Francis E. Heydt Co. v. United States of Am., & Richard Cheney, Sec'y of Def., United States Dep't of Def., 948 F.2d 672 (10th Cir. 1991). “Although the district court found the claim for payment of invoices properly resided with the Claims Court, it held the Secretary’s failure to afford notice and a hearing before taking the action under the Gratuities Act, 10 U.S.C. § 2207 , warranted an award of attorney fees…”
Chenega Mgmt., LLC v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 556 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “Count V also alleges that the January 14, 2010 Final Award Decision was arbitrary, because the source selection process was tainted by the alleged gratuity and unlawful bias in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 2207 , 18 U.S.C. § 201 , and FAR 3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.