10 U.S.C. § 2303
Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1807(c)(4), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4157]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1963–2010 · leading case: Paul v. United States, 371 U.S. 245 (1963).
Paul v. United States, 371 U.S. 245 (1963). “[28] 10 U. S. C. § 2303 . [29] 75 Stat. 377 -378.”
Global Comput. Enter., Inc. v. United States, 88 Fed. Cl. 350 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “See 10 U.S.C. § 2303 (a)(5). . The GAO questioned the timeliness of protests B-310823.”
Global Comput. Enter., Inc. v. United States, 88 Fed. Cl. 466 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “See 10 U.S.C. § 2303 (a)(5). Section 253 of title 41 of the United States Code is analogous to 10 U.”
United States of Am. & Charles A. Bowsher, Comptroller Gen. of the United States of Am. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 751 F.2d 220 (8th Cir. 1984). “10 U.S.C. § 2303 . MDC contends that because the aircraft manufactured by MDC were ultimately destined for the Republic of Korea and the Korean government deposited funds to pay for the aircraft in a Foreign Military Sales Trust Account, the contract does not fall within the…”
United States v. Charles L. Rodgers, Anthony J. Bertucci Constr. Co., Inc., Mack A. Mathis, Alois Luhr & Luhr Bros., Inc., 624 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1980). “See 10 U.S.C. §§ 2303 (a), 2304; Armed Services Procurement Regulation S 1-115, reprinted in 32 C.”
Datamill, Inc. v. United States, 91 Fed. Cl. 740 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “See 10 U.S.C. § 2303 (a)(2). . "[M]inor errors or irregularities, i.”
G. L. Christian & Assocs. v. The United States, 320 F.2d 345 (Ct. Cl. 1963). “10 U.S.C. § 2303 (b). Aside from specified requirements and prohibitions (not now pertinent), the Act leaves to the procuring agency the terms and conditions of both negotiated and advertised contracts.”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio, Plaintiffs v. John C. Stetson (Successor), Sec'y of the Air Force, Defendants, 640 F.2d 642 (5th Cir. 1981). “10 U.S.C. § 2303 (a) provides: This chapter applies to the purchase, and contract to purchase, by any of the following agencies, for its use or otherwise, of all property named in subsection (b), and all services, for which payment is to be made from appropriated funds: (1) The…”
Ellsworth Bottling Co. v. United States, 408 F. Supp. 280 (W.D. Okla. 1975). “10 U.S.C. § 2303 . These two facts do not, however, outweigh the specific exclusion of the Department of Defense from the amendments and the fact that the AAFES is clearly a part of the Department of Defense.”
Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters, Local F-100 v. United States Dep't of Navy, Naval Educ. & Training Ctr., 536 F. Supp. 1254 (D.R.I. 1982). “10 U.S.C. § 2303 ; see Hayes International Corp.”
United Biscuit Co. of Am. v. W. Willard Wirtz, Sec'y of Labor, 359 F.2d 206 (D.C. Cir. 1966). “10 U.S.C. § 2303 (a). 11 Military Commissary purchases are made with moneys drawn on *212 the Treasury from what are known as “stock funds.”
W. B. Fishburn Cleaners, Inc. v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 374 F. Supp. 162 (N.D. Tex. 1974). “AAFES, however, is not subject to that Act because it is operated out of nonappropriated funds, 10 U.S.C. § 2303 (1970), and, therefore, does not fit into the class of agencies intended to be exempt from Chapter 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.