10 U.S.C. § 2310
Renumbered § 4751]
[renumbered]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1971–1985 · leading case: Wheelabrator Corp. v. Chafee, 455 F.2d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 1971).
Wheelabrator Corp. v. Chafee, 455 F.2d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 1971). “” 10 U.S.C. § 2310 (b) (Supp. V 1970). The statute also provides, “Such a finding is final.”
Aero Corp. v. Dep't of the Navy, 540 F. Supp. 180 (D.D.C. 1982). “The procurement officer’s decision not to compete the contracts in 1979 and 1980 (as distinguished from his decision not to employ formal advertising) is plainly reviewable.”
Self-Powered Lighting, Ltd. v. United States, 492 F. Supp. 1267 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “” 10 U.S.C. § 2310 (a) & (b). 27 . M. Steinthal & Co.”
Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Brown, 452 F. Supp. 1245 (D.D.C. 1978). “Assuming the Navy’s selection of the Beech plane was permissible, the Determinations and Findings prepared by the Army comply with the formal requirements of 10 U.S.C. § 2310 (b) that such a Determination and Finding “clearly and convincingly establish .”
Irvin Indus., Inc. v. United States, 608 F. Supp. 907 (D.D.C. 1985). “§ 2304 (a)(16) are nonreviewable “final actions” as set forth in 10 U.S.C. § 2310 (b). The plaintiff, however, is not seeking review of the decision to contract the production of assemblies on a negotiated rather than advertised basis under 10 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.