10 U.S.C. § 2492

Nonappropriated fund instrumentalities: contracts with other agencies and instrumentalities to provide and obtain goods and services

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar
An agency or instrumentality of the Department of Defense that supports the operation of the exchange system, or the operation of a morale, welfare, and recreation system, of the Department of Defense may enter into a contract or other agreement with another element of the Department of Defense or with another Federal department, agency, or instrumentality—(1) to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the exchange system or that morale, welfare, and recreation system; or(2) to provide or obtain food services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the dining facilities on military installations offering food services to members of the armed forces.(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title III, § 341(a)(1), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2488, § 2482a; renumbered § 2492, Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, § 651(c)(3), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1972; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title VI, § 632, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3405.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 2492 was renumbered section 2489 of this title.

Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–291 substituted “Federal department, agency, or instrumentality—” for “Federal department, agency, or instrumentality to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the exchange system or that morale, welfare, and recreation system.” and added pars. (1) and (2).

2004—Pub. L. 108–375 renumbered section 2482a of this title as this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Commc'n Constr. Servs., Inc. v. United States, 116 Fed. Cl. 233 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
Commc'n Constr. Servs., Inc. v. United States, 116 Fed. Cl. 233 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “CCS filed the second Evard Declaration in response to the Government’s argument that CCS waived its claims that AAFES violated 10 U.S.C. § 2492 (a) and that ARMP’s and FMWRC’s involvement in this procurement created improper conflicts of interest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.