10 U.S.C. § 2731
Definition
In this chapter, “settle” means consider, ascertain, adjust, determine, and dispose of a claim, whether by full or partial allowance or by disallowance.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1970–2025 · leading case: Flowers v. United States, 75 Fed. Cl. 615 (Fed. Cl. 2007).
Flowers v. United States, 75 Fed. Cl. 615 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “§ 2735 (1976), which is applicable to military claims brought under 10 U.S.C. §§ 2731 -2737”); see also Merrifield v.”
Bryson v. United States, 463 F. Supp. 908 (E.D. Pa. 1978). “The Government asserts that the Military Claims Act, 10 U.S.C. § 2731 , et seq., affords no jurisdiction to this court.”
Merrifield v. United States, 14 Cl. Ct. 180 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “(1984), pursuant to the Military Claims Act (MCA), 10 U.S.C. §§ 2731 , et seq. and the Military Claims Act Regulations, 32 C.”
Louis J. Rodrigue, Adm'r of the Est. of William J. Rodrigue v. United States, 968 F.2d 1430 (1st Cir. 1992). “Because Airman William Rodrigue’s death occurred out of the country, relief lay not in the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), but in the Military Claims Act (MCA), 10 U.S.C. §§ 2731 et seq. Unlike the FTCA, where prior administrative denial is but a condition precedent to suit, 28…”
Jill K. Massie, as Mother & Next Friend of Autumn Massie v. United States, 166 F.3d 1184 (Fed. Cir. 1999). “" 10 U.S.C. § 2731 . Although the parties refer to the Agreement as a "settlement agreement” and section 2735 speaks of "settlement" of a claim, as discussed infra, use of that term begs the question in this case.”
Towry v. United States, 459 F. Supp. 101 (E.D. La. 1978). “” As the concept of the Secretary’s “consideration” is embodied within the definition of “settlement,” 10 U.S.C. § 2731 , such “considerations” are established as final and conclusive under § 2735.”
Massie v. United States, 40 Fed. Cl. 151 (Fed. Cl. 1997). “” 10 U.S.C. § 2731 . The procedural regulations for presenting a claim are contained in 32 C.”
Minns v. United States, 155 F.3d 445 (4th Cir. 1998). “42 , disallowed their claims made under the Military Claims Act, 10 U.S.C. § 2731 et seq., the wives and children filed these three actions against the United States both to review the Judge Advocate General’s decisions and to assert independent negligence claims under the…”
Michael Schneider Roisin Schneider, Individually & as Guardians of Slaine Schneider v. United States, 27 F.3d 1327 (8th Cir. 1994). “The settlement of a claim under the Military Claims Act, which includes the Military’s disposing of a claim by disallowance, see 10 U.S.C. § 2731 , is final agency action.”
Leola M. Broadnax v. United States Army. Leola M. Broadnax v. U.S. Army Hosp. Nuremberg, 710 F.2d 865 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “The Act further provides that the “settlement” of a claim under this section is “final and conclusive,” 10 U.”
Vogelaar v. United States, 665 F. Supp. 1295 (E.D. Mich. 1987). “The legislative history evinces a *1300 policy of prohibiting the review by other governmental entities of the administrative “settlement” of claims under the Military Claims Act. S.Rep. No. 1056, 92d Cong., 2d Sess.”
Lundeen v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 469 P.2d 886 (Wash. 1970). “She filed a claim for $175,000 on behalf of herself and the children under the Military Claims Act ( 10 U.S.C.A. § 2731 , et seq.). This was settled in August 1961 for $98,816 ($5,000 when the terms of the settlement were reached, and $93,816 after congress passed an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.