10 U.S.C. § 3014
Nontraditional defense contractor
In this part, the term “nontraditional defense contractor”, with respect to a procurement or with respect to a transaction authorized under section 4021(a) or 4022 of this title, means an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources by the Department of Defense for the procurement or transaction, any contract or subcontract for the Department of Defense that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to section 1502 of title 41 and the regulations implementing such section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1989–1991 · leading case: Robert Warren v. Dep't of the Army, 867 F.2d 1156 (8th Cir. 1989).
Robert Warren v. Dep't of the Army, 867 F.2d 1156 (8th Cir. 1989). “See 10 U.S.C. § 3014 (b)(4) (Supp. IV 1986). Finally, the requirements pertaining to prejudice and notice must have been fulfilled before the expiration of the applicable limitations period.”
Providence Journal Co. v. United States Dep't of the Army, 781 F. Supp. 878 (D.R.I. 1991). “*881 I Congress established the Army Inspector General (“IG”) in the Office of the Secretary of the Army under 10 U.S.C. § 3014 (b)(5). The statute directs the Army Inspector General to “inquire into and report upon the discipline, efficiency, and economy of the Army” 10 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.