U.S. Code » Title 10 » Subtitle Subtitle C— Navy and Marine Corps › Part PART IV— GENERAL ADMINISTRATION › Chapter CHAPTER 869— NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

10 U.S.C. § 333

LAND CONVEYANCE, PORTION OF NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE NUMBERED 2, TO CITY OF TAFT, CALIFORNIA.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Conveyance.—Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 8, 2005], there is conveyed to the City of Taft, California (in this section referred to as the ‘City’), all surface right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property consisting of approximately 220 acres located in the NE¼, the NE¼ of the NW¼, and the N½ of the SE¼ of the NW¼ of section 18, township 32 south, range 24 east, Mount Diablo meridian, Kern County, California.“(b)Consideration.—The conveyance under subsection (a) is made without the payment of consideration by the City.“(c)Treatment of Existing Rights.—The conveyance under subsection (a) is subject to valid existing rights, including Federal oil and gas lease SAC–019577.“(d)Treatment of Minerals.—All coal, oil, gas, and other minerals within the lands conveyed under subsection (a) are reserved to the United States, except that the United States and its lessees, licensees, permittees, or assignees shall have no right of surface use or occupancy of the lands. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require the United States or its lessees, licensees, permittees, or assignees to support the surface of the conveyed lands.“(e)Indemnify and Hold Harmless.—The City shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the United States for, from, and against, and the City shall assume all responsibility for, any and all liability of any kind or nature, including all loss, cost, expense, or damage, arising from the City’s use or occupancy of, or operations on, the land conveyed under subsection (a), whether such use or occupancy of, or operations on, occurred before or occur after the date of the enactment of this Act.“(f)Instrument of Conveyance.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute, file, and cause to be recorded in the appropriate office a deed or other appropriate instrument documenting the conveyance made by this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1963–2025 · leading case: Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (1970).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (1970). · cites it 2× “[16] The military remedy, designed to become available when the other remedies were inadequate, was created by § 3 of the 1871 Act, now 10 U. S. C. § 333 . See generally Comment, Federal Intervention in the States for the Suppression of Domestic Violence: Constitutionality,…”
Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 (1972). · cites it 2× “" *30 10 U. S. C. § 333 : "The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it— "(1)…”
Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli, 534 F.3d 213 (4th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “See 10 U.S.C.A. § 333 (a)(A) (West 2007) (amending the Insurrection Act to provide the President with this authority, notwithstanding the Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.”
Arlo Tatum, Cent. Comm. for Conscientious Objectors v. Melvin R. Laird, Sec'y of Def., 444 F.2d 947 (D.C. Cir. 1971). · cites it 2× “10 U.S.C. § 333 . The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it— (1) so hinders…”
Al-Marri v. Wright, 487 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “See 10 U.S.C.A. § 333 (a)(A) (2007) (amending the Insur- rection Act to provide the President with this authority, notwithstand- ing the Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.”
Betty J. Archie, as Special Adm'r of the Est. of Rena M. Delacy, Deceased v. City of Racine, Ronald W. Chiapete, & George W. Giese, 826 F.2d 480 (7th Cir. 1987). “, and authorized the President to use the militia or “any other means” to suppress any unlawful combination or conspiracy that “so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State,” that “any part or class of its people” is deprived of a…”
Massachusetts v. Laird, Sec'y of Def., 400 U.S. 886 (1970). “The Court denied Alabama relief, not because of Mellon , but because: “In essence the papers show ho more, than that the President has made ready to exercise the authority conferred upon him by 10 U. S. C. § 333 by alerting and stationing military personnel in the Birmingham…”
Bissonette v. Haig, 800 F.2d 812 (8th Cir. 1986). “, 10 U.S.C. §§ 333 (enforcement of judicial decrees by military pursuant to presidential proclamation), 371-78 (enforcement of drug laws in some circumstances).”
Alabama v. United States, 373 U.S. 545 (1963). “In essence the papers show no more than that the President has made, ready to exercise the authority conferred upon him by 10 U. S. C. § 333 by alerting and stationing military pérsonnel in the Birmingham area.”
Childress, Jason (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “The Oath of Office requires the public official in its foreign state capacity to uphold the constitutional form of government or face consequences: Title 10 U.S.C. § 333 . “Interference with State and Federal law” The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both,…”
Class v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2020). “Class cites to 10 U.S.C. § 333 in his complaint; however, this is an outdated citation.”
Harris v. Merz (D. Or. 2025). “§ 5531 (describing the authority of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to prohibit unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices); 10 U.S.C. § 333 (authorizing the Secretary of Defense to train and equip foreign security forces); 49 U.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.