10 U.S.C. § 679
Renumbered § 12311]
[renumbered]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1968–1999 · leading case: Brigadier Gen. Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Ronald Reagan, President of the United States, 729 F.2d 801 (D.C. Cir. 1984).
Brigadier Gen. Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Ronald Reagan, President of the United States, 729 F.2d 801 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “The armed services grant SWAG’s to reserve officers pursuant to 10 U.S.C. §§ 679 , 680 (1982). These agreements “provide for definitive terms of active duty and ensure that the Reservist will not be released involuntarily except according to specified procedures, including a…”
Hanes v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 441 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “As grounds for the denial, the CO referenced 10 U.S.C. § 679 (1988) (current version at 10 U.”
John A. Henneberger v. The United States, 403 F.2d 237 (Ct. Cl. 1968). “10 U.S.C. § 679 , which provides as follows : § 679.”
Colonel Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Jimmy Carter, President of the United States, 662 F.2d 73 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “10 U.S.C. §§ 679 (a), 680(a) (1976). In the absence of a SWAG, a Reservist may be released from active duty at any time, and such a change in status is committed to the sole discretion of the President or the Secretary of the appropriate armed service.”
Woodward v. Moore, 451 F. Supp. 346 (D.D.C. 1978). “, 10 U.S.C. §§ 679 and 680 (Active Duty Agreements); 10 U.”
Sharp v. Weinberger, 593 F. Supp. 886 (D.D.C. 1984). “Standard Written Agreements, or SWAG’s, guarantee a reserve officer entering active duty a “definitive term[] of active duty and ensure that the Reservist will not be released involuntarily except according to specified procedures.”
Dowds v. Bush, 792 F. Supp. 1289 (D.D.C. 1992). “10 U.S.C. § 679 (a). The Secretary may specify the term by written agreement.”
Alley v. United States, 5 Cl. Ct. 280 (Ct. Cl. 1984). “First plaintiff argues that the agreement was a contract of the type authorized by 10 U.S.C. § 679 (a). 4 He contends that, in releasing him as it did, de *282 fendant failed to follow the procedural requirements of § 680(a), 5 which address the involuntary release of a…”
Bradish G. Morse v. Boswell Jeffrey S. Berke, 393 U.S. 802 (1968). “Pursuant to 10 U. S. C. § 679 a reservist may sign an active duty agreement by which he obligates himself to serve at any time on active duty that he is called; furthermore, that obligation may be extended beyond the expiration date of the agreement in times of war or national…”
Sidoran v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 110 (Ct. Cl. 1977). “Plaintiff says the document of November 3, 1967, was a contract authorized by 10 U.S.C. §679 (a), which authorizes the Secretary to make "standard agreements” with reservists "to provide definite terms of active duty (other than for training) for reserves with their consent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.