10 U.S.C. § 7422

Degree granting authority for United States Army Armament Graduate School

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Authority.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, the Chancellor of the United States Army Armament Graduate School may, upon the recommendation of the faculty and provost of the school, confer appropriate degrees upon graduates who meet the degree requirements.(b)Limitation.—A degree may not be conferred under this section unless—(1) the Secretary of Education has recommended approval of the degree in accordance with the Federal Policy Governing Granting of Academic Degrees by Federal Agencies; and(2) the United States Army Armament Graduate School is accredited by the appropriate civilian academic accrediting agency or organization to award the degree, as determined by the Secretary of Education.(c)Congressional Notification Requirements.—(1) When seeking to establish degree granting authority under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives—(A) a copy of the self-assessment questionnaire required by the Federal Policy Governing Granting of Academic Degrees by Federal Agencies, at the time the assessment is submitted to the Department of Education’s National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity; and(B) the subsequent recommendations and rationale of the Secretary of Education regarding the establishment of the degree granting authority.(2) Upon any modification or redesignation of existing degree granting authority, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing the rationale for the proposed modification or redesignation and any subsequent recommendation of the Secretary of Education on the proposed modification or redesignation.(3) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing an explanation of any action by the appropriate academic accrediting agency or organization not to accredit the United States Army Armament Graduate School to award any new or existing degree.(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, § 553(a)(1), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1386.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Prior sections 7422 to 7425 were renumbered sections 8722 to 8725 of this title, respectively.

A prior section 7426, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 459; Pub. L. 94–258, title II, § 201(7), Apr. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 309; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, § 513(32)(A), (B), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2933; Pub. L. 98–525, title XIV, § 1405(52), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2625; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, § 1502(a)(2), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, § 1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774, related to cooperative or unit plans affecting Naval Petroleum Reserve Numbered 1, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [div. C, title XXXIV, § 3402(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–484. Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [div. C, title XXXIV, § 3402(c)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–484, provided that the repeal of section 7426 would not affect the validity of contracts in effect under that section on the day before Oct. 30, 2000, and that no such contracts could be extended or renewed on or after Oct. 30, 2000.

Prior sections 7427 to 7430 were renumbered sections 8727 to 8730 of this title, respectively.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1975–2000 · leading case: Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). · cites it 2× “309 , 10 U. S. C. § 7422 (c)(2)(C); Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Pub.”

Stand. Oil Co. of California v. United States, 231 Ct. Cl. 86 (Ct. Cl. 1982). “The court rejected the Navy’s contention that application of the price controls to oil produced on the Reserve would frustrate the purpose of the 1944 act ( 10 U.S.C. § 7422 (b)(1) (1976)) of conserving production on the Reserve.”

Mohawk Petroleum Corp. v. Dep't of the Navy, 521 F.2d 1394 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “10 U.S.C. § 7422 (b)(1). Concededly, the small production and sale now in controversy is designed to protect and test the reserve, and the Secretary deems it appropriate to continue this limited production and sale.”

Tinoqui-Chalola Council of Kitanemuk & Yowlumne Tejon Indians v. United States Dep't of Energy, 232 F.3d 1300 (9th Cir. 2000). “1 See Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976, 10 U.S.C. § 7422 (c) (1998). Pursuant to that direction and consistent with section 7 of the ESA, the DOE has consulted with the * FWS three times since it took over operations at Elk Hills.”

Legal Authorities Available to the President to Respond to a Severe Energy Supply Interruption or Other Substantial Reduction in Available Petroleum Prods. (OLC 1982). · cites it 2× “§ 6214 , and 10 U.S.C. § 7422 (b), to accelerate production of crude oil and natural gas on federal and state lands or petroleum products from the N PR s.”

— 10 U.S.C. § 7422(b)(2) — 1 case

Legal Authorities Available to the President to Respond to a Severe Energy Supply Interruption or Other Substantial Reduction in Available Petroleum Prods. (OLC 1982). “§ 6214 , and 10 U.S.C. § 7422 (b), to accelerate production of crude oil and natural gas on federal and state lands or petroleum products from the N PR s.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.