10 U.S.C. § 8012
Department of the Navy: seal
The Secretary of the Navy shall have a seal for the Department of the Navy. The design of the seal must be approved by the President. Judicial notice shall be taken of the seal.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1958–2005 · leading case: Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982).
Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982). “See 10 U. S. C. § 8012 (b). Because this mandate of office must include the authority to prescribe reorganizations and reductions in force, we conclude that petitioner's alleged wrongful acts lay well within the outer perimeter of his authority.”
William O. Schism & Robert Reinlie v. United States, 316 F.3d 1259 (Fed. Cir. 2002). “However, the statutes relevant to *1289 the retirees here are those in effect in 1951 for Schism and 1953 for Reinlie: 10 U.S.C. § 8012 (b)(1) (1942 Supp. IV) and 5 U.”
Pub. Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United States, 355 U.S. 534 (1958). “§ 6011 and 10 U. S. C. § 8012 (f) respectively. [5] Armed Services Procurement Regulations, 32 CFR, 1957 Cum.”
Michael Strickland v. United States, 423 F.3d 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “at 14 (holding that another statute, 10 U.S.C. § 8012 , gives the Secretary authority to delegate his powers to the corrections.”
Gifford v. United States, 23 Cl. Ct. 8 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “14 Plaintiff claims that the AFBCMR ignored established precedent when it adopted the position that 10 U.S.C. § 8012 gave the Secretary the authority to change the basis for the discharge from AFR 36-2 to AFR 36-3.”
G. L. Christian & Assocs. v. The United States, 320 F.2d 345 (Ct. Cl. 1963). “§ 3012 (Secretary of the Army); 10 U.S.C. § 8012 (Secretary of the Air Force); 5 U.”
United States v. Hoesing, 5 M.J. 355 (1978). “§ 5031 ; Department of the Air Force, 10 U.S.C. § 8012 . 14 U.S.C. § 92 . For example, see 10 U.”
Boyd v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1975). “Moreover, another statute, 10 U.S.C. § 8012 , gives to the Secretary of the Air Force complete responsibility for conducting all affairs of his department.”
S. Simcha Goldman v. Sec'y of Def., 734 F.2d 1531 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “753 , 764, AFR 35-10 is nevertheless entitled to all the deference due to exercises of validly delegated power, because the Secretary of the Air Force is generally authorized by 10 U.S.C. § 8012 (f) (1982) to prescribe regulations necessary to carry out his duties.”
United States v. Dillard, 4 M.J. 577 (1977). “” As far as we have been able to determine, there have been no directions or messages to Coast Guard authorities in response to the Courtney decision. . See Footnote 3.”
Tilley v. United States, 19 Cl. Ct. 33 (Ct. Cl. 1989). “” Under 10 U.S.C. § 8012 (f), the Secretary of the Air Force is authorized to “prescribe regulations to carry out his functions, powers, and duties under this title.”
Moyer v. United States, 302 F. Supp. 1235 (S.D. Fla. 1969). “More particularly, as regards the plaintiff’s charge that the United States had knowledge that the aircraft which it delivered to American Airmotive had an improper design, the Government contends that the selection of the aircraft and the aircraft equipment are matters…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.