10 U.S.C. § 860c

Art. 60c. Entry of judgment

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Entry of Judgment of General or Special Court-martial.—(1) In accordance with rules prescribed by the President, in a general or special court-martial, the military judge shall enter into the record of trial the judgment of the court. The judgment of the court shall consist of the following:(A) The Statement of Trial Results under section 860 of this title (article 60).(B) Any modifications of, or supplements to, the Statement of Trial Results by reason of—(i) any post-trial action by the convening authority; or(ii) any ruling, order, or other determination of the military judge that affects a plea, a finding, or the sentence.(2) Under rules prescribed by the President, the judgment under paragraph (1) shall be—(A) provided to the accused and to any victim of the offense; and(B) made available to the public.(b)Summary Court-martial Judgment.—The findings and sentence of a summary court-martial, as modified by any post-trial action by the convening authority under section 860b of this title (article 60b), constitutes the judgment of the court-martial and shall be recorded and distributed under rules prescribed by the President.(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LIX, § 5324, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2927.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (19 in the last 5 years), 2020–2026 · leading case: United States v. Vanzant (A.F.C.C.A. 2024).
United States v. Vanzant (A.F.C.C.A. 2024). · cites it 3× “Article 66(d), UCMJ, provides that a CCA “may act only with respect to the findings and sentence as entered into the record under [Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c].” 10 U.S.C. § 866 (d). 18 U.”
United States v. Johnson (C.A.A.F. 2025). · cites it 3× “Article 66(d)(2) authorizes the service courts to correct errors that occur “after the judgment was entered into the record under [Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a)].” Ar- ticle 60c, UCMJ, requires the military judge to enter the “judgment of the court” into the record of…”
United States v. Brubaker-Escobar (C.A.A.F. 2021). · cites it 2× “13,825] be- cause it grants additional rights to an accused that do not con- flict with Article 60c, UCMJ,” 10 U.S.C. § 860c (2018). In my view, both of these arguments by the parties are at least plau- sible—and perhaps entirely persuasive.”
United States v. BROWN (N.M.C.C.A. 2025). · cites it 2× “10 10 U.S.C. § 860c. 11 R.C.M. 1111(a)(2). 12 10 U.”
United States v. Brunson Jr. (N.M.C.C.A. 2025). · cites it 2× “8 10 U.S.C. § 860c. 9 R.C.M. 1111(a)(2). 10 10 U.”
United States v. Finco (A.F.C.C.A. 2020). “In this case, we derive our jurisdiction from Article 66(b)(3), UCMJ, which says “[a] Court of Criminal Appeals shall have jurisdiction over a court-martial in which the judgment entered into the record under [Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c] of this title includes a…”
United States v. Barrick (A.F.C.C.A. 2020). “” Article 60c(a)(1)(B)(i), 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a)(1)(B)(i) (2019 MCM) (emphasis added).”
United States v. Cruspero (A.F.C.C.A. 2020). “§ 866 (b)(3), which says “[a] Court of Criminal Appeals shall have juris- diction over a court-martial in which the judgment entered into the record un- der [Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c] of this title includes a sentence of .”
United States v. Lopez (A.F.C.C.A. 2020). “” Article 60c(a)(1)(B)(i), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a)(1)(B)(i) (2019 MCM) (empha- sis added).”
United States v. Rivera (N.M.C.C.A. 2021). “2000 , 2927 (codified at 10 U.S.C. § 860c (2018)). 5 United States v.”
United States v. Zier (A.F.C.C.A. 2023). “JOYCE Clerk of the Court 19Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c, requires an entry of judgment to record the Statement of Trial Results as may be modified or supplemented by the convening au- thority or military judge.”
United States v. Fernandez (A.F.C.C.A. 2024). “Article 66(d), UCMJ, provides that a CCA “may act only with respect to the findings and sentence as entered into the record under [Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c].” 10 U.S.C. § 866 (d). 18 U.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a) — 3 cases
United States v. Vanzant (A.F.C.C.A. 2024). “Article 66(d), UCMJ, provides that a CCA “may act only with respect to the findings and sentence as entered into the record under [Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c].” 10 U.S.C. § 866 (d). 18 U.”
United States v. Johnson (C.A.A.F. 2025). “Article 66(d)(2) authorizes the service courts to correct errors that occur “after the judgment was entered into the record under [Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a)].” Ar- ticle 60c, UCMJ, requires the military judge to enter the “judgment of the court” into the record of…”
United States v. Folts (C.A.A.F. 2025).
— 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a)(1) — 3 cases
United States v. Johnson (C.A.A.F. 2025). “Article 66(d)(2) authorizes the service courts to correct errors that occur “after the judgment was entered into the record under [Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a)].” Ar- ticle 60c, UCMJ, requires the military judge to enter the “judgment of the court” into the record of…”
United States v. Brubaker-Escobar (C.A.A.F. 2021). “13,825] be- cause it grants additional rights to an accused that do not con- flict with Article 60c, UCMJ,” 10 U.S.C. § 860c (2018). In my view, both of these arguments by the parties are at least plau- sible—and perhaps entirely persuasive.”
United States v. Vanzant (A.F.C.C.A. 2024). “Article 66(d), UCMJ, provides that a CCA “may act only with respect to the findings and sentence as entered into the record under [Article 60c, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c].” 10 U.S.C. § 866 (d). 18 U.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a)(1)(B)(i) — 3 cases
United States v. Barrick (A.F.C.C.A. 2020). “” Article 60c(a)(1)(B)(i), 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a)(1)(B)(i) (2019 MCM) (emphasis added).”
United States v. Lopez (A.F.C.C.A. 2020). “” Article 60c(a)(1)(B)(i), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860c(a)(1)(B)(i) (2019 MCM) (empha- sis added).”
United States v. Hong (A.F.C.C.A. 2021).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.