10 U.S.C. § 906a
Art. 106a. Wearing unauthorized insignia, decoration, badge, ribbon, device, or lapel button
A prior section 906a was renumbered section 903a of this title.
Section effective on
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1988–2018 · leading case: Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988). “[1] See 10 U. S. C. § 906a (peacetime espionage); 10 U.”
Loving v. United States, 517 U.S. 748 (1996). “In 1985, Congress enacted Article 106a of the UCMJ, 10 U. S. C. § 906a, which authorized the death penalty for espionage.”
United States v. Loving, 41 M.J. 213 (C.A.A.F. 1994). “106a(b) and (c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 906a(b) and (c) (procedures required by Congress for imposition of death penalty for espionage in violation of Article 106a(a)).”
United States v. Curtis, 28 M.J. 1074 (1989). “634 , which amended the Uniform Code of Military Justice by establishing espionage as a capital offense under Article 106a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 906a. This article creates certain aggravating factors which the members must unanimously find beyond a reasonable doubt in order to…”
Jose Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, Warden, Metro. Corr. Ctr., San Diego, California, United States of Am. v. Raul Chavez-Sanchez, 857 F.2d 1245 (9th Cir. 1988). “Against this background, the Justice Department advised the Commission that it had the authority to establish guidelines and procedures for imposing the death penalty for a broad range of criminal offenses, and encouraged the Commission to do so.”
United States v. Allen, 31 M.J. 572 (1990). “§ 892 , two specifications under Charge II alleging espionage activity on behalf of the Philippine Government in violation of Article 106a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 906a, and one specification under Charge III alleging violation of the Federal espionage statute, 18 U.”
United States v. Lonetree, 35 M.J. 396 (1992). “Specifically, the general court-martial found Lonetree guilty of three offenses under Article 81 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 881 ; four offenses under Article 92, UCMJ, 10 USC § 892 ; five offenses under Article 134, UCMJ, 10 USC § 934 ; and one offense…”
United States v. Anzalone, 43 M.J. 322 (C.A.A.F. 1995). “Solicitations under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934 , are limited to 5 years’ confinement, except for solicitation to commit espionage in violation of Article 106a, UCMJ, 10 USC § 906a, which carries confinement for life.”
United States v. Lonetree, 31 M.J. 849 (1990). “§ 934 , offenses; and one Article 106a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 906a, offense. . “Closed Session: If counsel for all parties, the military judge, and the members have received appropriate security clearances, the military judge may exclude the public during that por *853 tion of the…”
United States v. Herd, 29 M.J. 702 (1989). “106a and 110, 10 U.S.C. §§ 906a, 910. . Id., arts. 85, 90, and 113.”
United States v. Anzalone, 41 M.J. 142 (1994). “106a, 10 USC § 906a, Espionage (communication, delivery, or transmittal of certain material to foreign agents “with intent or reason to believe that” it would “be used” to injure the United States, “or attempts to” do so); Art.”
United States v. Allen, 28 M.J. 610 (1989). “§ 892 , two specifications alleging espionage activity in violation of Article 106a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 906a, and one specification of violating the federal espionage statute of 18 U.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 906a(b) — 1 case
United States v. Loving, 41 M.J. 213 (C.A.A.F. 1994). “106a(b) and (c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 906a(b) and (c) (procedures required by Congress for imposition of death penalty for espionage in violation of Article 106a(a)).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.