10 U.S.C. § 944
Art. 144. Procedure
The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces may prescribe its rules of procedure and may determine the number of judges required to constitute a quorum.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2000–2018 · leading case: United States v. Quiroz, 55 M.J. 334 (C.A.A.F. 2001).
United States v. Quiroz, 55 M.J. 334 (C.A.A.F. 2001). “44, UCMJ, 10 USC § 944 , in light of applicable judicial precedents.”
Ortiz v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2165 (2018). “The CAAF also decides cases “ ‘according to the established law.”
United States v. Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100 (C.A.A.F. 2005). “17 10 U.S.C. § 944 (2000). 6 United States v.”
United States v. Lee, 54 M.J. 285 (C.A.A.F. 2000). “by a service Court of Criminal Appeals properly constituted and lawfully operating with not less than three appellate judges per panel, as Congress intended and mandates in Article 66(a), UCMJ.”
United States v. Williams, 75 M.J. 244 (C.A.A.F. 2016). “While the statute does not by its own terms set a deadline for the JAG’s filing of a certificate for review, 1 Congress has authorized this Court to “prescribe its own rules of procedure,” Article 144, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 944 (2012), and the Court’s rules do provide for such a…”
Ortiz v. United States (2018). “The CAAF also decides cases “ ‘according to the established law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.