10 U.S.C. § 948q
Charges and specifications
A prior section 948q, added Pub. L. 109–366, § 3(a)(1),
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2024 · leading case: Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States, 840 F.3d 757 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States, 840 F.3d 757 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “2010), pursuant to which an authorized person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice must swear a charge, under oath, against a defendant, 10 U.S.C. § 948q(a); see Manual for Military Commissions, Rule for Military Commissions (R.”
Obaydullah v. Obama, 609 F.3d 444 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “10 U.S.C. § 948q; Rule 307. Second, the “convening authority” — either the Secretary of Defense or his designee — decides whether the charge should be dismissed or referred to a military commission for trial.”
In re: Encep Nurjaman (D.C. Cir. 2024). “See 10 U.S.C. § 948q(a); Regulation for Trial by Military Commission 3-1 (2011).”
— 10 U.S.C. § 948q(a) — 2 cases
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States, 840 F.3d 757 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “2010), pursuant to which an authorized person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice must swear a charge, under oath, against a defendant, 10 U.S.C. § 948q(a); see Manual for Military Commissions, Rule for Military Commissions (R.”
In re: Encep Nurjaman (D.C. Cir. 2024). “See 10 U.S.C. § 948q(a); Regulation for Trial by Military Commission 3-1 (2011).”
— 10 U.S.C. § 948q(b) — 1 case
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States, 840 F.3d 757 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “2010), pursuant to which an authorized person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice must swear a charge, under oath, against a defendant, 10 U.S.C. § 948q(a); see Manual for Military Commissions, Rule for Military Commissions (R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.