10 U.S.C. § 950j
Finality of proceedings, findings, and sentences
The appellate review of records of trial provided by this chapter, and the proceedings, findings, and sentences of military commissions as approved, reviewed, or affirmed as required by this chapter, are final and conclusive. Orders publishing the proceedings of military commissions under this chapter are binding upon all departments, courts, agencies, and officers of the United States, subject only to action by the Secretary or the convening authority as provided in section 950i(c) of this title and the authority of the President.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2007–2013 · leading case: Boumediene, Lakhdar v. Bush, George, 476 F.3d 981 (D.C. Cir. 2007).
Boumediene, Lakhdar v. Bush, George, 476 F.3d 981 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “It then adds 10 U.S.C. § 950j, which deals with the finality of military commission decisions.”
Khadr v. Bush, 587 F. Supp. 2d 225 (D.D.C. 2008). “Likewise, the jurisdictional limitation found in 10 U.S.C. § 950j(b) does not apply here because it bars courts only from hearing “any claim or cause of action whatsoever .”
Hamdan v. Gates, 565 F. Supp. 2d 130 (D.D.C. 2008). “He also asserts that the MCA violates the equal protection component of Fifth Amendment due process by subjecting only aliens to trial by military commission, and that the Commission’s potential allowance of certain kinds of hearsay evidence and evidence obtained through…”
Abd Al-Nashiri v. Bruce MacDonald, 741 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2013). “The 2009 MCA omits 10 U.S.C. § 950j(b), a statutory provision from the 2006 MCA that barred courts from hearing “any claim or cause of action whatsoever .”
Khadr v. Obama, 724 F. Supp. 2d 61 (D.D.C. 2010). “2600 (2006)) (codified at 10 U.S.C. § 950j(b)). 5 But the Military Commissions Act of 2009, Pub.”
Khadr v. Bush (D.D.C. 2010). “2600 (2006) (codified at 10 U.S.C. §950j(b)).5 But the Military Commissions Act of 2009, Pub.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 950j(b) — 6 cases
Khadr v. Bush, 587 F. Supp. 2d 225 (D.D.C. 2008). “Likewise, the jurisdictional limitation found in 10 U.S.C. § 950j(b) does not apply here because it bars courts only from hearing “any claim or cause of action whatsoever .”
Boumediene, Lakhdar v. Bush, George, 476 F.3d 981 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “It then adds 10 U.S.C. § 950j, which deals with the finality of military commission decisions.”
Hamdan v. Gates, 565 F. Supp. 2d 130 (D.D.C. 2008). “He also asserts that the MCA violates the equal protection component of Fifth Amendment due process by subjecting only aliens to trial by military commission, and that the Commission’s potential allowance of certain kinds of hearsay evidence and evidence obtained through…”
Abd Al-Nashiri v. Bruce MacDonald, 741 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2013). “The 2009 MCA omits 10 U.S.C. § 950j(b), a statutory provision from the 2006 MCA that barred courts from hearing “any claim or cause of action whatsoever .”
Khadr v. Obama, 724 F. Supp. 2d 61 (D.D.C. 2010). “2600 (2006)) (codified at 10 U.S.C. § 950j(b)). 5 But the Military Commissions Act of 2009, Pub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.