11 U.S.C. § 112
Prohibition on disclosure of name of minor children
The debtor may be required to provide information regarding a minor child involved in matters under this title but may not be required to disclose in the public records in the case the name of such minor child. The debtor may be required to disclose the name of such minor child in a nonpublic record that is maintained by the court and made available by the court for examination by the United States trustee, the trustee, and the auditor (if any) serving under section 586(f) of title 28, in the case. The court, the United States trustee, the trustee, and such auditor shall not disclose the name of such minor child maintained in such nonpublic record.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1921–2025 · leading case: Tow v. Henley (In re Henley), 480 B.R. 708 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2012).
Tow v. Henley (In re Henley), 480 B.R. 708 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2012). “See, 11 U.S.C. § 112 ; Fed. R. Bankr.P. 1007(m).”
Clippard v. Russell (In Re Russell), 392 B.R. 315 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008). “11 U.S.C. § 112 . The court presumes that this statute is known to and enforced by the U.”
In Re Consol. Factors Corp., 59 F.2d 193 (2d Cir. 1932). “Dannenberg must forego fees for his prior services (which is merely suggested without expressing an opinion that either Order XLII [11 USCA § 53] or section 72 of the act [11 USCA § 112] so requires), this fact might reduce the amount of compensation allowable to the appellees,…”
Albers v. Dickinson, 127 F.2d 957 (8th Cir. 1942). “842 , 11 U.S.C.A. § 112 , which provides that no trustee “shall in any form or guise receive, nor shall the court allow him, any other or further compensation for his services than that expressly authorized and prescribed in this title”.”
In Re Owl Drug Co., 16 F. Supp. 139 (D. Nev. 1936). “Section 72 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended ( 11 U.S.C.A. § 112 ), provides that: “Neither the referee, receiver, marshal, nor trustee shall in any form or guise receive, nor shall the '.”
Nisonoff v. Irving Trust Co., 68 F.2d 32 (2d Cir. 1933). “Beyond question no receiver or trustee may lawfully receive, directly or indirectly, as compensation for his services more than is allowed by the Bankruptcy Act (section 72 [11 USCA § 112]).”
Realty Assocs. Sec. Corp. v. Newman & Bisco, 69 F.2d 41 (2d Cir. 1934). “Section 72 (11 USCA § 112) provides that neither referee, receiver, marshal, nor trustee shall be allowed, in any form or guise, any compensation other than prescribed in the act.”
In Re Scott, 53 F.2d 89 (W.D. Mich. 1931). “Fourth, because the invariable practice of the Grand Rapids Credit Men’s Association is contrary to the provisions of section 72 of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 112), which provides in substance that no trustee shall in any form or guise receive any other or further…”
In Re Allied Owners Corp., 79 F.2d 187 (2d Cir. 1935). “* * *" Under section 40a, the referee here was limited to a fee of $15 and his filing fees, and under section 72 of the act (11 USCA § 112) could not "in any form or guise receive * * * any other or further compensation.”
In Re Street Railways Advert. Co., 54 F. Supp. 577 (S.D.N.Y. 1941). “Stevenson may not be compensated for the legal services which he has rendered to the receiver because this would result in allowing the receiver to indirectly obtain other compensation contrary to Sections 72 and 62 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 112 , 102; also that the…”
In the Matter of Hamilton Distributors, Inc., Bankrupt. Appeal of Glenn R. Heyman, Receiver & Tr., 440 F.2d 1178 (7th Cir. 1971). “11 U.S.C. § 112 . The 1938 amendment, however, changed the provision to permit receipt of compensation for services not required by the Act by adding the words “as required by this Act” to the quoted provision.”
McMillan v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 22 F.2d 155 (8th Cir. 1927). “This somewhat novel suggestion, if carried into effect, would fly in the face of section 72 of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 112): “That neither the referee, receiver, marshal, nor trustee shall in any form or guise receive, nor shall the court allow him, any other or further…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.