11 U.S.C. § 1128
Confirmation hearing
[Section 1129 (enacted as section 1128)] Subsection (a) requires that there be a hearing in every case on the confirmation of the plan. Notice is required.
Subsection (b) permits any party in interest to object to the confirmation of the plan. The Securities and Exchange Commission and indenture trustees, as parties in interest under section 1109, may object to confirmation of the plan.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 94
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp., 580 U.S. 451 (2017).
Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp., 580 U.S. 451 (2017). “See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1128 , 1129, 1141. But sometimes the parties cannot agree on a plan.”
In re Global Indus. Tech., Inc., 645 F.3d 201 (3d Cir. 2011). “" 11 U.S.C. § 1128 (b). In applying the teachings of James Wilson and Amatex, we are guided by our previous statement that "[s]ection 1109(b) must be construed broadly to permit parties affected by a chapter 11 proceeding to appear and be heard.”
In re Combustion Eng'g, Inc. First State Ins. Co. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 391 F.3d 190 (1st Cir. 2004). “11 U.S.C. § 1128 (b). The Code defines "party in interest” to include "the debtor, the trustee, a creditors’ committee, an equity security holders' committee, a creditor, an equity security holder, or any indenture trustee.”
In re B. Cohen & Sons Caterers, Inc., 124 B.R. 642 (E.D. Pa. 1991). “” 11 U.S.C. § 1128 (1979). All creditors of a debtor are parties in interest.”
In re Cypresswood Land Partners, I, 409 B.R. 396 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2009). “] 11 U.S.C. § 1128 (b) states that “[a] party in interest may object to confirmation of a plan.”
CoreStates Bank, N.A. v. Huls Am., Inc., 176 F.3d 187 (3d Cir. 1999). “Under 11 U.S.C. § 1128 (b), “[a] party in interest may object to the confirmation of a plan.”
Reliable Elec. Co. v. Olson Constr. Co., 726 F.2d 620 (10th Cir. 1984). “11 U.S.C. § 1128 (a) provides: “After notice, the court shall hold a hearing on confirmation of a plan.”
In re Acequia, Inc., Debtor. Acequia, Inc. v. Vernon B. Clinton, 787 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1986). “” 11 U.S.C. §§ 1128 (a), 1129(a)(1) (1982).”
Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Michelson (In Re Michelson), 141 B.R. 715 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 1992). “17 The notice and opportunity for hearing procedure that permits action without an actual hearing where the statute provides for “notice and a hearing” if nobody objects or requests a hearing is inapplicable. 11 U.”
In re Lettick Typografic, Inc., 103 B.R. 32 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1989). “Although no party in interest has objected, 11 U.S.C. § 1128 (b), and the Office of the United States Trustee has filed no comment suggesting that confirmation should be denied, 28 U.”
Big Shanty Land Corp. v. Comer Props., Inc., 61 B.R. 272 (N.D. Ga. 1985). “Pursuant to the order of the Bankruptcy Court, and with the consent of debtor, Stricklin devoted its time and money to submitting a plan.”
Morgan Olson L.L.C. v. Frederico (In Re Grumman Olson Indus., Inc.), 467 B.R. 694 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “368(b) (trustee may sell property of the estate “after notice and a hearing”); 11 U.S.C. § 1128 (“After notice, the court shall hold a hearing on confirmation of a plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.