11 U.S.C. § 1166

Effect of subtitle IV of title 49 and of Federal, State, or local regulations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 11 CasesGoogle Scholar
Except with respect to abandonment under section 1170 of this title, or merger, modification of the financial structure of the debtor, or issuance or sale of securities under a plan, the trustee and the debtor are subject to the provisions of subtitle IV of title 49 that are applicable to railroads, and the trustee is subject to orders of any Federal, State, or local regulatory body to the same extent as the debtor would be if a petition commencing the case under this chapter had not been filed, but—(1) any such order that would require the expenditure, or the incurring of an obligation for the expenditure, of money from the estate is not effective unless approved by the court; and(2) the provisions of this chapter are subject to section 601(b) of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973.(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2642; Pub. L. 97–449, § 5(a)(2), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2442; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, § 518, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 388; Pub. L. 103–394, title V, § 501(d)(34), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4146.)Historical and Revision Noteslegislative statements

Section 1166 of the House amendment is derived from sections 1164 and 1165 of the House bill. An alternative proposal contained in section 1168(1) of the Senate bill is rejected as violative of the principle of equal treatment of all creditors under title 11.

senate report no. 95–989

Section 1168 [enacted as section 1166] makes the trustee subject to the Interstate Commerce Act [49 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.] and to lawful orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and State and regulatory bodies. The approval of the court is required, however, if the order requires the expenditure of money or the incurring of an expenditure other than the payment of certain interline accounts. The limitation of “lawful orders” of State commissions to those involving “safety, location of tracks, and terminal facilities,” which is contained in present section 77(c)(2) [section 205(c)(2) of former title 11], is eliminated.

Subsection (1) further provides that the debtor must pay in cash all amounts owed other carriers for current balances owed for interline freight, passenger and per diem, including incentive per diem, for periods both prior and subsequent to the filing of the petition, without the necessity of court approval.

Subsection (2) makes the provisions of the chapter subject to section 601(b) of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act [45 U.S.C. 791(b)], which excludes the Interstate Commerce Commission from any participation in the reorganization of certain northeast railroads that have transferred their rail properties to Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail).

house report no. 95–595

Section 1164 [enacted as section 1166] makes the debtor railroad subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act [49 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.] that are applicable to railroads, and the trustee subject to the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission to the same extent as the debtor would have been if the case had not been commenced. There are several exceptions. The section does not apply with respect to abandonment of rail lines, which is provided for under section 1169, or with respect to merger under a plan, modification of the financial structure of the debtor by reason of the plan, or the issuance or sale of securities under a plan. Further, the orders of the ICC are not effective if the order would require the expenditure or the incurring of an obligation for the expenditure of money from the estate, unless approved by the court, and the provisions of this chapter are subject to section 601(b) of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 [45 U.S.C. 791(b)].

[Section 1165 (enacted as section 1166)] The same rules apply with respect to Federal, State, or local regulations. The trustee is subject to the orders of a Federal, State, or local regulatory body to the same extent as the debtor would be if the case had not been commenced. However, any order that would require the expenditure, or the incurring of an obligation for the expenditure, of money is not effective under [until] approved by the court.

Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Section 601(b) of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973, referred to in par. (2), is classified to section 791(b) of Title 45, Railroads.

Amendments

1994—Par. (2). Pub. L. 103–394 struck out “(45 U.S.C. 791(b))” after “Act of 1973”.

1984—Pub. L. 98–353 directed substitution of “subtitle IV of title 49” for “the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)”, which substitution had previously been made by Pub. L. 97–449.

1983—Pub. L. 97–449 substituted “subtitle IV of title 49” for “Interstate Commerce Act” in section catchline, and “subtitle IV of title 49” for “the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)” in text.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1979–2004 · leading case: Boston & Maine Corp. v. Chicago Pac. Corp., 785 F.2d 562 (7th Cir. 1986).
Boston & Maine Corp. v. Chicago Pac. Corp., 785 F.2d 562 (7th Cir. 1986). · cites it 3× “11 U.S.C. § 1166 . The Senate version of what is now § 1166 codified our holding in Rock Island I.”
Murray v. Mobil Chem. Co. (In Re Chicago, Missouri & W. Ry. Co.), 156 B.R. 567 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1993). · cites it 4× “20 by 11 U.S.C. § 1166 , which subjects the “trustee and the debtor .”
Howard v. Surface Transp. Bd., 389 F.3d 259 (1st Cir. 2004). · cites it 3× “See 11 U.S.C. § 1166 (“Except with respect to abandonment under section 1170” [and certain other situations] .”
In the Matter of Boston & Maine Corp., Debtor v. The First Nat'l Bank of Boston, 618 F.2d 137 (1st Cir. 1980). · cites it 2× “, 11 U.S.C. §§ 1166 , 1170, 1172 (1979). See also 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1166.”
In the Matter of Iowa R.R. Co., Debtor. Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Terry F. Moritz, Tr. of Iowa R.R. Co., 840 F.2d 535 (7th Cir. 1988). “See 11 U.S.C. § 1166 , the provision into which § 1168 of the Senate bill evolved.”
In Re Auto-Train Corp., 6 B.R. 510 (D.D.C. 1980). · cites it 3× “See 11 U.S.C. § 1166 . Conventional rules of statutory construction, as well as the authoritative treatise commentary, would seem to mandate that the Court apply in the railroad reorganization the concepts of “adequate protection” or “adequate assurance” in the same manner as in…”
In Re Auto-Train Corp., 11 B.R. 418 (D.D.C. 1981). · cites it 2× “As a regulated carrier, the trustee is clearly subject to ICC regulations within the ordinary parameters of 11 U.S.C. § 1166 of the Code. 11 U.S.C. § 1166 , in relevant part, expressly provides that: “Except with respect to abandonment under Section 1170 of this title, or…”
Appeal of Apalachicola N. Ry. Co. v. First Nat'l Bank, 632 F.2d 45 (7th Cir. 1980). · cites it 2× “11 U.S.C. § 1166 . Since in Rock Island we held that such orders were binding on the court, respondents assert that the Rock Island decision has been legislatively overruled and that therefore the Bankruptcy Reform Act is dispositive of the issue presented by this appeal.”
In re Boston & Maine Corp., 600 F.2d 307 (1st Cir. 1979). “95-598 § 1166, 11 U.S.C. § 1166 . The legislative history of this provision indicates that Congress expressly rejected a draft that would have codified the Rock Island rule.”
In re Boston & Maine Corp., 634 F.2d 1359 (1st Cir. 1980). “The court found in the terms of the Bankruptcy Reform Act provision, 11 U.S.C. § 1166 , a resolution of any supposed contradiction between Section 77(c)(2) and Section 77(7) in the requirement that both the ICC and the reorganization court approve payment for both pre- and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.